Investment in Next Generation Networks and the Role of Regulation: A Real Option Approach



invested one year earlier (see Figure 9). Thus the value assigned to the payout variable in
the Citéfibre case is obtained by multiplying by three the foregone revenues suffered in the
period in which the decision to postpone was made.

Per unit up-front costs are estimated by resorting to a study of the investment costs of
NGN published the French telecommunications regulator Arcep (2006): the average cost
estimated by Arcep (€500) has been decreased to take into account that in Paris the roll-out
of the fibre is less expensive due to the possibility of exploiting the sewage system. A
sanity check of this value has been carried out by comparing with the value inferred
directly using Citéfibre available data. The up-front cost is therefore assumed to be equal to
€400.

Figure 9 - Revenues lost by investing one year later

The annualized volatility of the log return has been estimated using bi-weekly stock
returns. Since Citéfibre was floated on Euronext on the 2nd December 2005, the sample size
is slightly above 45 observations. A higher frequency would have increased the accuracy of
the estimate by increasing the number of observations; however this might have entailed an

24 Prior to December 2005 Citéfibre was not traded and thus this is the first market capitalisation availble.

26



More intriguing information

1. Manufacturing Earnings and Cycles: New Evidence
2. Antidote Stocking at Hospitals in North Palestine
3. Convergence in TFP among Italian Regions - Panel Unit Roots with Heterogeneity and Cross Sectional Dependence
4. The name is absent
5. Do the Largest Firms Grow the Fastest? The Case of U.S. Dairies
6. The name is absent
7. The name is absent
8. Barriers and Limitations in the Development of Industrial Innovation in the Region
9. The name is absent
10. Olive Tree Farming in Jaen: Situation With the New Cap and Comparison With the Province Income Per Capita.