A Note on Productivity Change in European Co-operative Banks: The Luenberger Indicator Approach



of technical efficiency: German co-operative banks should upgrade their managerial skills and
scale if they are to improve performance.

5. Discussion and Conclusion

An aggregate Luenberger productivity indicator is used to estimate and decompose
productivity growth on 11,816 observations of EU co-operative banks between 1996 and
2003. These data were used previously by Molyneux and Williams (2005) who employed
stochastic frontier analysis and Fourier flexible functional form methodologies, and the
productivity decomposition approach of Berger and Mester (2003) to estimate productivity
growth. The present set of results using an alternative productivity measure can confirm the
consistency of both methodological approaches.

There is productivity growth in the co-operative banking industry which is driven by
improvements in technological change. Even though it is positive, the rate of technological
change varies across countries. This finding is consistent with previous research on the co-
operative banking sector (see Molyneux and Williams, 2005) and the European banking
industry in general (see Casu et al, 2004). As in Casu et al (2004) and Williams (2001), we
observe evidence that banks in a limited number of markets are catching-up with European
best practice: in Portugal, Italy and Spain, technical efficiency change is as important as
technological change in driving productivity growth. Possible explanations for this feature of
the results include the establishment of a more competition environment (and ensuing banking
sector consolidation) brought about by the single market and other deregulatory acts.

Several policy implications arise from the results. First and foremost, it is clear that
there is considerable room for improving technical efficiency if co-operative banks are to
catch-up with industry best practice. Technical inefficiency is a consequence of one or more
of the following factors: (i) structural rigidities that create principal-agent problems (Jensen
and Meckling, 1976); (ii) rigidities associated with EU labour markets which give rise to
collective-action problems (Olson, 1965); (iii) organisational factors associated with X-
efficiency (Leibenstein, 1966); and (iv), dimensional factors associated with scale and scope
economies. Due to any, some or all of these factors, co-operative banks may produce at a
level below the maximum possible output, given the production environment. Arguably, some
of the above problems might be reduced by changing the ownership structure of co-operative

10



More intriguing information

1. The name is absent
2. The Employment Impact of Differences in Dmand and Production
3. Optimal Tax Policy when Firms are Internationally Mobile
4. The name is absent
5. Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on Epigenetic Robotics
6. SAEA EDITOR'S REPORT, FEBRUARY 1988
7. The name is absent
8. Gender and headship in the twenty-first century
9. AN IMPROVED 2D OPTICAL FLOW SENSOR FOR MOTION SEGMENTATION
10. The name is absent
11. How does an infant acquire the ability of joint attention?: A Constructive Approach
12. Mergers under endogenous minimum quality standard: a note
13. Financial Markets and International Risk Sharing
14. A Regional Core, Adjacent, Periphery Model for National Economic Geography Analysis
15. A Rare Presentation of Crohn's Disease
16. Campanile Orchestra
17. On the Existence of the Moments of the Asymptotic Trace Statistic
18. The name is absent
19. Strategic monetary policy in a monetary union with non-atomistic wage setters
20. Experience, Innovation and Productivity - Empirical Evidence from Italy's Slowdown