A Note on Productivity Change in European Co-operative Banks: The Luenberger Indicator Approach



Table 2: Descriptive Statistics: ECU million (inflation-adjusted); 1996-2003

_____________________________Inputs_____________________

______Outputs___________________

Country

Statistic

Fixed

Assets

Variable
Cost

Customer

Loans_____

Interbank

Loans

Securities

OBS

AUS

Average

29.66

126.12

1,207.18

792.73

409.23

162.86

Std dev

61.12

331.73

2,926.01

2,229.60

1,037.32

393.33

BEL

Average

17.56

187.17

1,251.08

1,301.09

1,273.23

1,060.28

Std dev

47.07

524.42

2,872.97

3,851.44

3,751.96

3,533.41

FIN

Average

614.55

1,294.99

20,678.66

895.56

5,103.35

3,694.88

Std dev

121.83

109.02

3,571.04

583.89

558.41

919.64

FRA

Average

139.32

1,204.28

8,787.42

5,578.85

5,883.21

4,869.44

Std dev

526.14

4,451.62

32,984.55

26,360.68

26,782.04

20,284.89

GER

Average

13.28

41.69

400.26

193.02

195.43

70.81

Std dev

173.17

431.30

3,461.31

3,034.14

2,455.10

1,035.72

ITA

Average

16.83

52.97

541.03

135.10

192.16

167.89

Std dev

83.46

246.52

2,807.71

695.52

792.65

959.21

LUX

Average

11.66

61.46

618.46

638.69

132.97

121.13

Std dev

11.32

56.25

602.09

524.69

192.23

108.81

NL

Average

3,010.26

14,498.44

152,577.43

27,475.78

62,028.50

29,882.20

Std dev

1,520.75

7,903.83

85,253.20

16,004.37

37,666.80

16,430.58

PTE

Average

142.32

273.17

2,907.49

533.66

682.77

276.54

Std dev

105.03

202.59

2,272.23

346.29

516.51

325.89

SPA

Average

45.32

98.45

1,259.81

499.69

360.69

175.63

Std dev

65.58

99.86

1,742.15

910.18

549.42

210.31

The aggregate Luenberger productivity indicators are calculated using linear
programming techniques. The results are presented in Table 3, with the productivity
indicators (AL) decomposed into its constituents: technical efficiency change (the diffusion or
catch-up component - EFFCH); and technological change (the innovation or frontier-shift
component - TECH). EFFCH represents the diffusion of best-practice technology in the
management of banking activities and it is attributable to investment planning, technical
experience, and management and organization. TECH results from innovations and the
adoption of new technologies by best-practice banks in each country.

From Table 3, we observe the productivity change score (AL) is positive for European
co-operative banks across all countries; all banking sectors experienced productivity gains
between 1996 and 2003. The mean is distorted by the result for Portugal; omitting the
Portuguese score yields a mean productivity score of 0.2073 that is bettered by the co-
operative banking sectors in Italy, Spain, Finland and France, and which is consistent with the



More intriguing information

1. ARE VOLATILITY EXPECTATIONS CHARACTERIZED BY REGIME SHIFTS? EVIDENCE FROM IMPLIED VOLATILITY INDICES
2. The name is absent
3. Langfristige Wachstumsaussichten der ukrainischen Wirtschaft : Potenziale und Barrieren
4. Globalization and the benefits of trade
5. DEMAND FOR MEAT AND FISH PRODUCTS IN KOREA
6. Does South Africa Have the Potential and Capacity to Grow at 7 Per Cent?: A Labour Market Perspective
7. Multifunctionality of Agriculture: An Inquiry Into the Complementarity Between Landscape Preservation and Food Security
8. The Impact of EU Accession in Romania: An Analysis of Regional Development Policy Effects by a Multiregional I-O Model
9. Spousal Labor Market Effects from Government Health Insurance: Evidence from a Veterans Affairs Expansion
10. An Efficient Secure Multimodal Biometric Fusion Using Palmprint and Face Image
11. The bank lending channel of monetary policy: identification and estimation using Portuguese micro bank data
12. Yield curve analysis
13. An alternative way to model merit good arguments
14. The name is absent
15. The name is absent
16. Road pricing and (re)location decisions households
17. The name is absent
18. The name is absent
19. A Review of Kuhnian and Lakatosian “Explanations” in Economics
20. A THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK FOR EVALUATING SOCIAL WELFARE EFFECTS OF NEW AGRICULTURAL TECHNOLOGY