data sample for the random effects specification. As in the main text we present for each
rating agency an unrestricted and a restricted model. The overall fit seems very good
even though slightly lower than the one obtained with the linear transformation. Again
broadly the same core variables are also picked up as relevant determinants of the rating
levels: GDP per capita, GDP growth, government debt, government effectiveness
indicators, external debt, external reserves, and default history.
Table A3.1 - Logistic transformation
|
Rating |
AAA |
AA+ |
AA |
AA- |
A+ |
A |
A- |
BBB+ BBB BBB- |
BB+ |
BB |
BB- |
B+ |
B |
B- |
<B- | ||
|
Linear |
17 |
16 |
15 |
14 |
13 |
12 |
11 |
10 |
9 |
8 |
7 |
6 |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
|
Logistic |
3.5 |
2.34 |
1.76 |
1.35 |
1.02 |
0.74 |
0.48 |
0.24 |
0 |
-0.2 |
-0.5 |
-0.7 |
-1 |
-1.4 |
-1.8 |
-2.3 |
-3.5 |
Figure A3.1 - Linear and logistic transformations
17
16
15
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
61
More intriguing information
1. Corporate Taxation and Multinational Activity2. Life is an Adventure! An agent-based reconciliation of narrative and scientific worldviews
3. Sustainability of economic development and governance patterns in water management - an overview on the reorganisation of public utilities in Campania, Italy, under EU Framework Directive in the field of water policy (2000/60/CE)
4. The name is absent
5. SAEA EDITOR'S REPORT, FEBRUARY 1988
6. Developing vocational practice in the jewelry sector through the incubation of a new ‘project-object’
7. Multiple Arrhythmogenic Substrate for Tachycardia in a
8. Dual Inflation Under the Currency Board: The Challenges of Bulgarian EU Accession
9. Workforce or Workfare?
10. The name is absent