Quality practices, priorities and performance: an international study



Reeves C. A. and Bednar D. A. [1994]. “Defining Quality: Alternatives and Implications”, Academy of
Management Review,
vol.19, no.3, pp.419-445.

Subba Rao S., Raghunathan T. S. and Solis L. E. [1997], “A Comparative Study of Quality Practices and
Results in India, China and Mexico”,
Journal of Quality Management, vol.2, no.2, pp.235-250.

Tata J., Prasad S. and Motwani J. [2000], “Benchmarking Quality Management Practices: U.S. Versus Costa
Rica”,
Multinational Business Review, vol.8, no.2, pp.37-42

Zhao X., Maheshwari S. K and Zhang J. [1995]. “Benchmarking Quality practices in India, China and
Mexico”,
Benchmarking for Quality Management & Technology, vol.2, no.3, pp.20-32.

Note: The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of the Higher Education Authority via the Institute for
International Integration Studies

12



More intriguing information

1. Agricultural Policy as a Social Engineering Tool
2. Bidding for Envy-Freeness: A Procedural Approach to n-Player Fair Division Problems
3. Howard Gardner : the myth of Multiple Intelligences
4. Yield curve analysis
5. Imperfect competition and congestion in the City
6. Family, social security and social insurance: General remarks and the present discussion in Germany as a case study
7. The name is absent
8. The name is absent
9. Strategic Policy Options to Improve Irrigation Water Allocation Efficiency: Analysis on Egypt and Morocco
10. Detecting Multiple Breaks in Financial Market Volatility Dynamics