Party Groups and Policy Positions in the European Parliament



Party Positions in the EP -- p14

6. EP policy platforms and national member parties

One emerging area which students of politics in the European Union have only recently
begun to explore relates to differences in policy competition at the national and EU levels.
For instance, how much does agreement between policy positions explain which national
parties join which EP party groupings? Do parties in national elections adopt policy positions
as a result of policy influences from their EP party group? Or conversely, do EP party group
policy positions directly reflect the policy platforms of their national constituent parties? It is
quite possible that the nature and direction of these influences will differ according to policy
arena. We view research into this area of the Europeanization of policy among EU political
parties as one of the most promising areas for emerging research into the two overlapping
arenas of European party competition.

Our preliminary investigation of this issue compares the estimated policy positions of EP
party groups to the distribution of the policy positions of their constituent (member state)
national-level political parties. Data on these national-level positions come from the left
-right
positions from the expert surveys reported in Benoit and Laver (forthcoming). Figure 3
portrays, for each EP party group, the kernel density estimate of member state party positions,
as well as the mean and confidence interval of the EP party group position on each issue. The
graphs also indicate how many national member parties were included in each analysis (a full
listing is provided in Appendix B).2

[Figure 3 about here]

The first obvious result is the clear correspondence between the mean EP group position
on left
-right and the central tendency of the national party left-right positions. By and large,
the EP party groups’ left
-right positions neatly reflect the central tendencies of their
constituent parties. In addition, as seen from the shape of their kernel densities, the member
parties of these EP groups clearly have similar national party positions on the left
-right
dimension, even though some groups include a small number of parties that are out of step
with the central group position. It should be recalled that the EP and national country results

2 The EDD was excluded from the analysis as we had only 3 expert surveys at the national level for their
constituent parties.



More intriguing information

1. APPLYING BIOSOLIDS: ISSUES FOR VIRGINIA AGRICULTURE
2. Studies on association of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi with gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus and its effect on improvement of sorghum bicolor (L.)
3. A Location Game On Disjoint Circles
4. The storage and use of newborn babies’ blood spot cards: a public consultation
5. The name is absent
6. Direct observations of the kinetics of migrating T-cells suggest active retention by endothelial cells with continual bidirectional migration
7. Integration, Regional Specialization and Growth Differentials in EU Acceding Countries: Evidence from Hungary
8. The name is absent
9. Learning-by-Exporting? Firm-Level Evidence for UK Manufacturing and Services Sectors
10. The name is absent
11. The name is absent
12. Strategic Planning on the Local Level As a Factor of Rural Development in the Republic of Serbia
13. Lending to Agribusinesses in Zambia
14. The name is absent
15. The Role of State Trading Enterprises and Their Impact on Agricultural Development and Economic Growth in Developing Countries
16. WP 48 - Population ageing in the Netherlands: Demographic and financial arguments for a balanced approach
17. SME'S SUPPORT AND REGIONAL POLICY IN EU - THE NORTE-LITORAL PORTUGUESE EXPERIENCE
18. Philosophical Perspectives on Trustworthiness and Open-mindedness as Professional Virtues for the Practice of Nursing: Implications for he Moral Education of Nurses
19. Innovation Trajectories in Honduras’ Coffee Value Chain. Public and Private Influence on the Use of New Knowledge and Technology among Coffee Growers
20. Robust Econometrics