Table A.2
Regressions of Changes in Relative Yield Spreads of SCM Long-Term Corporate
Bond Indices on Percentage Changes in the Yield of the Constant Maturity Long-
Term Government of Canada Index and the Return on the Toronto Stock
Exchange 300 Index - AR-GARCH Estimation
Table A.2 reports the results of the AR-GARCH estimation of regression model (2) in
which the dependent variable is the monthly change in the relative yield spread. This
regression model is of the following form:
∆R = a + b ∆P Y + cI + ε,
where ∆R is the monthly change in the relative yield spread, ∆PY is the monthly
percentage change in the yield of the constant maturity, long-term Government of
Canada index, and I is the monthly return on the Toronto Stock Exchange 300 index.
t-values are in parentheses, m gives the degree of the autoregressive process as
determined by the stepwise autoregression method, p and q are the GARCH(p,q)
parameters, Norm. Test gives the p-value for the normality test for detecting
misspecification of the GARCH model, and finally LM gives the p-value for the
Lagrange multiplier test. Panel A reports the estimates for the entire sample, covering
the 08:1976-07:2001 25-year period. Data during this sample period are dominated by
corporate bonds carrying a standard call provision. Panel B outlines the results for the
01:1995-07:2001 sub-period, in which bonds carrying the doomsday call are expected
to dominate all indices.
____________________________Panel A: 09:1976-07:2001_________________________ | |||||||||
__________Regression Coefficients |
AR and GARCH Parameters_______________ | ||||||||
Index |
a |
b |
c______ |
m |
P |
_±_ |
Norm. Test |
R2 |
LM |
AAA |
0.0002 |
-0.1510 (-8.52) |
-0.0193 (-1.53) |
1, 2 |
1 |
1 |
0.0005 |
0.24 |
0.0003 |
AA |
0.0004 |
-0.1541 (-7.89) |
-0.0589 (-4.62) |
1, 2 |
1 |
1 |
<0.0001 |
0.21 |
0.0057 |
A |
0.0002 |
-0.2169 (-12.98 ) |
-0.0561 (-3.91) |
1, 2 |
1 |
1 |
<0.0001 |
0.26 |
0.0037 |
BBB |
0.0013 |
-0.3778 (-6.84) |
-0.1247 (-2.98) |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0.14 |
- |
Panel B |
: 01:1995-07:2001__________ | ||||||||
Regression Coefficients |
AR and GARCH Parameters |
Goodness of Fit | |||||||
Index |
a |
b |
c______ |
m |
P |
_q_ |
Norm. Test |
R2 |
LM |
AAA |
N/A |
AA |
-0.0002 (-0.08) |
-0.3294 (-4.42) |
-0.1266 (-2.69) |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0.23 |
- |
A |
0.0006 |
-0.3502 (-4.83) |
-0.1214 (-2.65) |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0.25 |
- |
BBB |
0.0012 |
-0.2404 (-2.07) |
-0.2398 (-3.49) |
3 |
- |
- |
- |
0.20 |
- |
45
More intriguing information
1. The Effects of Reforming the Chinese Dual-Track Price System2. Notes on an Endogenous Growth Model with two Capital Stocks II: The Stochastic Case
3. Improving behaviour classification consistency: a technique from biological taxonomy
4. Cross border cooperation –promoter of tourism development
5. The name is absent
6. An Interview with Thomas J. Sargent
7. LOCAL PROGRAMS AND ACTIVITIES TO HELP FARM PEOPLE ADJUST
8. AN ANALYTICAL METHOD TO CALCULATE THE ERGODIC AND DIFFERENCE MATRICES OF THE DISCOUNTED MARKOV DECISION PROCESSES
9. Multifunctionality of Agriculture: An Inquiry Into the Complementarity Between Landscape Preservation and Food Security
10. SOME ISSUES CONCERNING SPECIFICATION AND INTERPRETATION OF OUTDOOR RECREATION DEMAND MODELS