A Pure Test for the Elasticity of Yield Spreads



Table A.1

Regressions of Changes in Absolute Yield Spreads of SCM Long-Term
Corporate Bond Indices on Changes in the Yield of the Constant Maturity Long-
Term Government of Canada Index and the Return on the Toronto Stock
Exchange 300 Index - AR-GARCH Estimation

Table A.1 reports the results of the AR-GARCH estimation of regression model (1) in
which the dependent variable is the monthly change in the absolute yield spread. This
regression model is of the following form:

5, = a + b ∆ Y + cI + ε,                               .

where ∆.S' is the monthly change in the absolute yield spread, Y is the monthly:
change in the yield of the constant maturity, long-term Government of Canada index,
and
I is the monthly return on the Toronto Stock Exchange 300 index. t-values are in
parentheses,
m gives the degree of the autoregressive process as determined by the:
stepwise autoregression method,
p and q are the GARCH(p,q) parameters, Norm. Test
gives the
p-value for the normality test for detecting misspecification of the GARCH
model, and finally LM gives the
p-value for the Lagrange multiplier test. Panel A:
reports the estimates for the entire sample, covering the 08:1976-07:2001 25-year
period. Data during this sample period are dominated by corporate bonds carrying a:
standard call provision. Panel B outlines the results for the 01:1995-07:2001 sub-
period, in which bonds carrying the doomsday call are expected to dominate all
indices.

____________________________Panel A: 09:1976-07:2001_________________________

__________Regression Coefficients

AR and GARCH Parameters_______________

Index

a

b

c______

m

p_

ɪ

Norm. Test

R2

LM

AAA

0.0007
(0.12)

-0.0563

(-3.27)

-0.0302

(-0.20)

1, 2

1

1

<0.0001

0.19

0.0004

AA

0.0006
(0.12)

-0.1428

(-9.67)

-0.4287

(-4.02)

1, 2, 4

1

1

<0.0001

0.18

0.0006

A

0.0003
(0.05)

-0.1346

(-8.88)

-0.5162

(-4.26)

1, 2

1

1

<0.0001

0.19

<0.0001

BBB

0.0098
(0.81)

-0.1641

(-4.37)

-1.2119

(-3.76)

1, 2

-

-

-

0.12

-

Panel B

: 01:1995-07:2001__________

Regression Coefficients

AR and GARCH Parameters

Goodness of Fit

Index

a

b

c______

m

_p_

ɪ

Norm. Test

R2

LM

AAA

N/A

AA

-0.0041

(-0.27)

-0.2106

(-3.12)

-0.6623

(-2.26)

-

-

-

-

0.14

-

A

0.0015
(0.10)

-0.1927

(-3.02)

-0.6160

(-2.22)

-

-

-

-

0.13

-

BBB

0.0026
(0.09)

0.0578
(0.58)

-1.3416

(-3.26)

3

-

-

-

0.17

-

44



More intriguing information

1. Existentialism: a Philosophy of Hope or Despair?
2. New issues in Indian macro policy.
3. Effects of a Sport Education Intervention on Students’ Motivational Responses in Physical Education
4. The name is absent
5. The name is absent
6. The name is absent
7. TINKERING WITH VALUATION ESTIMATES: IS THERE A FUTURE FOR WILLINGNESS TO ACCEPT MEASURES?
8. The name is absent
9. THE UNCERTAIN FUTURE OF THE MEXICAN MARKET FOR U.S. COTTON: IMPACT OF THE ELIMINATION OF TEXTILE AND CLOTHING QUOTAS
10. Asymmetric transfer of the dynamic motion aftereffect between first- and second-order cues and among different second-order cues
11. Mortality study of 18 000 patients treated with omeprazole
12. Understanding the (relative) fall and rise of construction wages
13. The name is absent
14. The Mathematical Components of Engineering
15. The name is absent
16. Examining the Regional Aspect of Foreign Direct Investment to Developing Countries
17. Evidence-Based Professional Development of Science Teachers in Two Countries
18. Computational Batik Motif Generation Innovation of Traditi onal Heritage by Fracta l Computation
19. Does adult education at upper secondary level influence annual wage earnings?
20. Technological progress, organizational change and the size of the Human Resources Department