Reform of the EU Sugar Regime: Impacts on Sugar Production in Ireland



able to redress the inequitable distribution of burdens, raising concerns in
some quarters about a possible race to the bottom of protection standards.
However, there has so far been no academic attempt to use relevant
theoretical models developed in the field of economic migration (Ranis and
Fei, 1969; Harris and Todaro 1970; Borjas 1990; Massey et al. 1993) to
systematically analyse patterns of asylum flows in order to establish the
importance of policy and other historical, economic or political migration
pull factors that can explain why asylum seekers apply in a particular
country.

Regarding the second question, on the capacity of public policy in this
area, there is still little consensus as to whether liberal states can control
unwanted migration (Freeman 1994). The ‘transnationalist’ strand of the
literature (Sassen 1996; Jacobson 1995; Soysal 1994) emphasises systemic
constraints that undermine the capacity of states to assert effective
control in this area. In contrast, the more ‘state-centrist’ strand of the
literature (Holzer, Schneider and Widmer 2000; Guiraudon and Lahav
2000; Joppke 1997; 1998) argues that states have found new ways to
regulate migration in an era of increasing interdependence, which enables
them to retain much of their regulatory capacity in this area, even to the
extent that their measures have undermined some of the more liberal
aspects of the international migration regime.

Largely missing from the literature have been quantitative studies that
systematically analyse empirical evidence across time and space4 and
which might offer more conclusive answers about the determinants of
asylum seekers’ choice of destination country and the effectiveness of
public policy in regulating asylum flows. In an attempt to fill this gap, this
paper analyses UNHCR and OECD data from 20 OECD countries for the
period 1985-1999 and shows many public policy measures aimed, at least
in part, at deterring unwanted migration and at addressing the highly

4 One notable exception is the study by Holzer and Schneider (2002).



More intriguing information

1. Policy Formulation, Implementation and Feedback in EU Merger Control
2. The name is absent
3. Human Resource Management Practices and Wage Dispersion in U.S. Establishments
4. A Pure Test for the Elasticity of Yield Spreads
5. Why Managers Hold Shares of Their Firms: An Empirical Analysis
6. The name is absent
7. Retirement and the Poverty of the Elderly in Portugal
8. Importing Feminist Criticism
9. Language discrimination by human newborns and by cotton-top tamarin monkeys
10. Placentophagia in Nonpregnant Nulliparous Mice: A Genetic Investigation1
11. Opciones de política económica en el Perú 2011-2015
12. Three Policies to Improve Productivity Growth in Canada
13. The name is absent
14. The name is absent
15. Effort and Performance in Public-Policy Contests
16. Personal Income Tax Elasticity in Turkey: 1975-2005
17. The name is absent
18. Government spending composition, technical change and wage inequality
19. Measuring and Testing Advertising-Induced Rotation in the Demand Curve
20. The Economics of Uncovered Interest Parity Condition for Emerging Markets: A Survey