Polarization Rates, Distributional Shifts, and
the Economic Cycle
This section looks at the basic distributions of male and female workers
across earnings intervals, how these have changed over the 1982-96 period,
and the evidence for any cyclical variation in these changes.
Table 1 shows the distribution of men and women workers across
earnings intervals for the two end years of the sample and for peak (1989)
Table 1: Distribution of Workers across Earnings Intervals
for Men and Women, Selected Years, 1982-1996
(percentages)
Very |
Low |
Low Middle |
High |
High |
Very High | |
All Workers | ||||||
1982 |
11.2 |
13.4 |
25.4 |
22.1 |
14.8 |
13.1 |
1983 |
12.0 |
13.9 |
24.2 |
21.3 |
14.8 |
13.9 |
1989 |
11.0 |
13.5 |
25.5 |
22.0 |
14.2 |
13.7 |
1992 |
12.4 |
14.0 |
23.6 |
21.0 |
14.0 |
15.0 |
1996 |
12.4 |
13.9 |
23.7 |
20.8 |
13.5 |
15.7 |
Mean |
11.77 |
13.80 |
24.41 |
21.29 |
14.24 |
14.47 |
Men | ||||||
1982 |
7.4 |
9.6 |
19.8 |
23.1 |
20.0 |
20.1 |
1983 |
8.2 |
10.5 |
19.1 |
21.2 |
19.7 |
21.3 |
1989 |
7.0 |
9.8 |
20.2 |
22.8 |
19.0 |
21.3 |
1992 |
9.4 |
11.3 |
19.5 |
20.2 |
17.5 |
22.1 |
1996 |
9.3 |
11.1 |
20.1 |
20.1 |
16.4 |
23.0 |
Mean |
8.17 |
10.52 |
19.75 |
21.25 |
18.41 |
21.91 |
Women | ||||||
1982 |
16.7 |
18.7 |
33.3 |
20.6 |
7.5 |
3.2 |
1983 |
17.2 |
18.5 |
31.3 |
21.4 |
8.1 |
3.5 |
1989 |
16.2 |
18.4 |
32.1 |
20.8 |
8.3 |
4.2 |
1992 |
16.0 |
17.3 |
28.5 |
21.9 |
9.7 |
6.5 |
1996 |
16.0 |
17.3 |
27.9 |
21.6 |
10.1 |
7.1 |
Mean |
16.37 |
17.98 |
30.38 |
21.31 |
8.91 |
5.03 |
458
Charles M. Beach and Ross Finnie
More intriguing information
1. FUTURE TRADE RESEARCH AREAS THAT MATTER TO DEVELOPING COUNTRY POLICYMAKERS2. Experience, Innovation and Productivity - Empirical Evidence from Italy's Slowdown
3. The name is absent
4. The name is absent
5. Policy Formulation, Implementation and Feedback in EU Merger Control
6. The name is absent
7. Are Japanese bureaucrats politically stronger than farmers?: The political economy of Japan's rice set-aside program
8. The name is absent
9. Evolution of cognitive function via redeployment of brain areas
10. SOME ISSUES CONCERNING SPECIFICATION AND INTERPRETATION OF OUTDOOR RECREATION DEMAND MODELS