Appendix Table 23: Scenario-Based Projections of Aboriginal Labour Force in 2017, Canada, Provinces and Territories,
Working Age Population unless otherwise noted
Panel I, British Columbia, Population Aged 15+
2001 |
2017 |
% Change 2001- |
Absolute |
Aboriginal contribution | |
Scenario 1 | |||||
Aboriginal Participation Rate |
62.9 |
62.9 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
- |
Aboriginal Labour Force |
79,757 |
101,584 |
27.4 |
21,826 |
3.57 |
Scenario 2 | |||||
Aboriginal Participation Rate |
62.9 |
64.1 |
1.9 |
1.2 |
- |
Aboriginal Labour Force |
79,757 |
103,517 |
29.8 |
23,760 |
3.88 |
Scenario 3 | |||||
Aboriginal Participation Rate |
62.9 |
65.3 |
3.8 |
2.4 |
- |
Aboriginal Labour Force |
79,757 |
105,451 |
32.2 |
25,694 |
4.20 |
Panel J: The Territories (Nunavut, Yukon, NWT), Population Aged 15+
2001 |
2017 |
% Change 2001- |
Absolute |
Aboriginal contribution | |
Scenario 1 | |||||
Aboriginal Participation Rate |
63.0 |
63.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
- |
Aboriginal Labour Force |
20,664 |
30,933 |
49.7 |
10,269 |
100.43 |
Scenario 2 | |||||
Aboriginal Participation Rate |
63.0 |
69.1 |
9.7 |
6.1 |
- |
Aboriginal Labour Force |
20,664 |
33,936 |
64.2 |
13,272 |
129.80 |
Scenario 3 | |||||
Aboriginal Participation Rate |
63.0 |
75.2 |
19.4 |
12.2 |
- |
Aboriginal Labour Force |
20,664 |
36,939 |
78.8 |
16,275 |
159.16 |
Notes:
Scenario 1: Projections for the Aboriginal labour assume that the participation rate of Aboriginals and non-Aboriginals remain
constant.
Scenario 2: Projections for the Aboriginal labour force assume that the participation rate of the non-Aboriginal population does not
change from the 2001 rate and the Aboriginal participation level for 2017 reaches the midpoint between the Aboriginal and the non-
Aboriginal participation rates for 2001.
Scenario 3: Projections for the Aboriginal labour force assume that the Aboriginal participation rate achieves parity with the non-
Aboriginal employment rate by 2017 .
Scenario 4: Projections assume that the Aboriginals attain the participation rate of the general population projected in Dungan and
Murphy for 2017 (65.6 per cent).
Source: Appendix Table 22
More intriguing information
1. TLRP: academic challenges for moral purposes2. Rural-Urban Economic Disparities among China’s Elderly
3. Estimation of marginal abatement costs for undesirable outputs in India's power generation sector: An output distance function approach.
4. The name is absent
5. The name is absent
6. Credit Market Competition and Capital Regulation
7. Party Groups and Policy Positions in the European Parliament
8. Mergers and the changing landscape of commercial banking (Part II)
9. Innovation in commercialization of pelagic fish: the example of "Srdela Snack" Franchise
10. Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews