Appendix Table 27: The Percentage Contribution in the Change in the Number of Employed between
2001 and 2017
|
% of the WAP that is |
% Contribution in the Total Number of | ||||
|
2001 |
2017 |
Scenario 1 |
Scenario 2 |
Scenario 3 | |
|
Canada |
2.95 |
3.37 |
4.17 |
5.91 |
7.64 |
|
Atlantic Provinces |
2.17 |
2.81 |
7.88 |
10.73 |
13.59 |
|
Quebec |
1.13 |
1.08 |
0.62 |
1.25 |
1.88 |
|
Ontario |
1.65 |
1.66 |
1.47 |
1.99 |
2.52 |
|
Manitoba |
11.56 |
14.60 |
24.68 |
38.71 |
52.75 |
|
Saskatchewan |
10.90 |
16.80 |
105.57 |
186.00 |
266.43 |
|
Alberta |
4.69 |
5.59 |
6.80 |
9.50 |
12.21 |
|
British Columbia |
3.96 |
3.90 |
3.02 |
4.66 |
6.30 |
|
Territories |
45.22 |
56.31 |
90.99 |
146.31 |
201.63 |
Sources: Appendix table 22 and 24
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. Non-causality in Bivariate Binary Panel Data
3. APPLYING BIOSOLIDS: ISSUES FOR VIRGINIA AGRICULTURE
4. INTERACTION EFFECTS OF PROMOTION, RESEARCH, AND PRICE SUPPORT PROGRAMS FOR U.S. COTTON
5. The name is absent
6. DEMAND FOR MEAT AND FISH PRODUCTS IN KOREA
7. DIVERSITY OF RURAL PLACES - TEXAS
8. The name is absent
9. The name is absent
10. Testing Panel Data Regression Models with Spatial Error Correlation