Table 3. Preferences toward Risk
Hypothetical Trials |
_______Real Trials | ||||||
H1 |
H2 |
R1 |
R2 |
R3 |
R4 |
Mean | |
Mean risk premium |
7.75 |
8.04 |
7.00 |
6.44 |
4.96 |
3.59 |
5.50 |
Standard deviation |
10.64 |
7.45 |
7.50 |
7.84 |
9.75 |
10.19 |
6.96 |
Wilcoxon test p valuea |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.01 |
0.00 |
Mean risk ratio |
0.89 |
0.89 |
0.91 |
0.91 |
0.93 |
0.96 |
0.93 |
Standard deviation |
0.15 |
0.12 |
0.10 |
0.11 |
0.14 |
0.15 |
0.10 |
# Risk averse |
38 |
43 |
43 |
39 |
35 |
32 |
38 |
# Risk neutral |
1 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
1 |
0 |
# Risk seeking |
12 |
5 |
6 |
9 |
12 |
18 |
13 |
a Wilcoxon signed rank test. H0: Mean risk premium equal zero. |
Not graded
Quality V
Very tender
Tender
Less tender
Graded
Quality A |
Quality B |
Quality C |
Very tender
Tender
Less tender
Figure 1. Tenderness Grading
11
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. The name is absent
3. The InnoRegio-program: a new way to promote regional innovation networks - empirical results of the complementary research -
4. The English Examining Boards: Their route from independence to government outsourcing agencies
5. INTERACTION EFFECTS OF PROMOTION, RESEARCH, AND PRICE SUPPORT PROGRAMS FOR U.S. COTTON
6. Ultrametric Distance in Syntax
7. Why Managers Hold Shares of Their Firms: An Empirical Analysis
8. GROWTH, UNEMPLOYMENT AND THE WAGE SETTING PROCESS.
9. Om Økonomi, matematik og videnskabelighed - et bud på provokation
10. Survey of Literature on Covered and Uncovered Interest Parities