Table 3. Preferences toward Risk
Hypothetical Trials |
_______Real Trials | ||||||
H1 |
H2 |
R1 |
R2 |
R3 |
R4 |
Mean | |
Mean risk premium |
7.75 |
8.04 |
7.00 |
6.44 |
4.96 |
3.59 |
5.50 |
Standard deviation |
10.64 |
7.45 |
7.50 |
7.84 |
9.75 |
10.19 |
6.96 |
Wilcoxon test p valuea |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.01 |
0.00 |
Mean risk ratio |
0.89 |
0.89 |
0.91 |
0.91 |
0.93 |
0.96 |
0.93 |
Standard deviation |
0.15 |
0.12 |
0.10 |
0.11 |
0.14 |
0.15 |
0.10 |
# Risk averse |
38 |
43 |
43 |
39 |
35 |
32 |
38 |
# Risk neutral |
1 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
1 |
0 |
# Risk seeking |
12 |
5 |
6 |
9 |
12 |
18 |
13 |
a Wilcoxon signed rank test. H0: Mean risk premium equal zero. |
Not graded
Quality V
Very tender
Tender
Less tender
Graded
Quality A |
Quality B |
Quality C |
Very tender
Tender
Less tender
Figure 1. Tenderness Grading
11
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. The name is absent
3. The name is absent
4. Can a Robot Hear Music? Can a Robot Dance? Can a Robot Tell What it Knows or Intends to Do? Can it Feel Pride or Shame in Company?
5. Yield curve analysis
6. Popular Conceptions of Nationhood in Old and New European
7. Why Managers Hold Shares of Their Firms: An Empirical Analysis
8. Wirtschaftslage und Reformprozesse in Estland, Lettland, und Litauen: Bericht 2001
9. Short- and long-term experience in pulmonary vein segmental ostial ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation*
10. Les freins culturels à l'adoption des IFRS en Europe : une analyse du cas français