Experimental Evidence of Risk Aversion in Consumer Markets: The Case of Beef Tenderness



Lusk, J.L., T. Feldkamp, and T.C. Schroeder. “Experimental Auction Procedure: Impact on Valuation
of Quality Differentiated Goods.”
American Journal of Agricultural Economics 86(2004):
389-405.

Lusk, J.L., J.A. Fox, T.C. Schroeder, J. Mintert, and M. Koohmaraie. “In-store Valuation of Steak
Tenderness.”
American Journal of Agricultural Economics 83(2001): 539-50.

Miller, M.F., M.A. Carr, C.B. Ramsey, K.L. Crockett, and L.C. Hoover. “Consumer Thresholds for
Establishing the Value of Beef Tenderness.”
Journal of Animal Science 79 (2001): 3062-68.

Murphy, J.J., P.G. Allen, T.H. Stevens, and D. Weatherhead. “A Meta Analysis of Hypothetical Bias
in Stated Preference Valuation.” Forthcoming in
Environmental and Resource Economics,
2004.

National Beef Quality Audit - 2000. “Improving the Quality, Consistency, Competitiveness and
Market-Share of Fed-Beef. The Final Report of the Third Blueprint for Total Quality
Management in the Fed-Beef (Slaughter Steer/Heifer) Industry”. Retrieved October 4, 2004
from
http://meat.tamu.edu/nbqa2000/nbqa2000.pdf.

Pennings, J.M.E., and P. Garcia. “Measuring Producers’ Risk Preferences: A Global Risk Attitude
Construct.”
American Journal of Agricultural Economics 83(2001): 993-1009.

Shogren, J.F., J.A. Fox, D.J. Hayes, and J.B. Kliebenstein. “Bid Sensitivity and the Structure of the
Vickrey Auction.”
American Journal of Agricultural Economics 76(1994a): 1089-95.

Shogren, J.F., J.A. List, and D.J. Hayes. “Preference Learning in Consecutive Experimental
Auctions.”
American Journal of Agricultural Economics 82(2000): 1017-21.

Shogren, J.F., S.Y. Shin, D.J. Hayes, and J.B. Kliebenstein. “Resolving Differences in Willingness to
Pay and Willingness to Accept.”
American Economic Review 84(1994b): 255-70.

Sivertsen, H.K., E. Kubber0d, and K.I. Hildrum. “Consumer Preferences of Beef Tenderness and
Mechanical Measurements.”
Journal of Sensory Studies 17 (2002): 365-78.

Umberger, W.J., and D.M. Feuz. “The Usefulness of Experimental Auctions in Determining
Consumers' Willingness to Pay for Quality Differentiated Products.”
Review of Agricultural
Economics
26(Summer 2004): 1-16.

Vickrey, W. “Counterspeculation, Auctions, and Competitive Sealed Tenders.” Journal of Finance
16(1961): 8-37.

Wakker, P., and D. Deneffe. “Eliciting von Neumann-Morgenstern Utilities when Probabilities are
Distorted or Unknown.”
Management Science 42(1996): 1131-50.



More intriguing information

1. Inhimillinen pääoma ja palkat Suomessa: Paluu perusmalliin
2. Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews
3. PROFITABILITY OF ALFALFA HAY STORAGE USING PROBABILITIES: AN EXTENSION APPROACH
4. SOME ISSUES IN LAND TENURE, OWNERSHIP AND CONTROL IN DISPERSED VS. CONCENTRATED AGRICULTURE
5. The name is absent
6. Sex differences in the structure and stability of children’s playground social networks and their overlap with friendship relations
7. The name is absent
8. An Intertemporal Benchmark Model for Turkey’s Current Account
9. The name is absent
10. Strategic Effects and Incentives in Multi-issue Bargaining Games
11. Text of a letter
12. ROBUST CLASSIFICATION WITH CONTEXT-SENSITIVE FEATURES
13. How do investors' expectations drive asset prices?
14. The name is absent
15. Existentialism: a Philosophy of Hope or Despair?
16. EXPANDING HIGHER EDUCATION IN THE U.K: FROM ‘SYSTEM SLOWDOWN’ TO ‘SYSTEM ACCELERATION’
17. ALTERNATIVE TRADE POLICIES
18. If our brains were simple, we would be too simple to understand them.
19. An alternative way to model merit good arguments
20. Towards a Mirror System for the Development of Socially-Mediated Skills