Are Japanese bureaucrats politically stronger than farmers?: The political economy of Japan's rice set-aside program



Are Japanese bureaucrats politically stronger than farmers?: The political economy of
Japan’s rice set-aside program

Katsumi Arahata

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to examine the political process of bureaucrats’ seemingly
discretionary allocations among prefectures in Japan’s rice set-aside program. Some
hypotheses and a model are proposed and then these are empirically tested. Two major
findings of this study are as follows:

Firstly, it is suggested that the bureaucrats’ discretionary allocation tends to be
revised in response to political pressure. Consequently, allocations among prefectures
tend to be inversely proportionate to the degree of political pressures. Moreover, such
pressures can be explained by the expected income from rice-production and the share
of part-time farmers, who are the majority in Japanese rural society and politically
powerful.

Secondly, among various factors which are publicly announced as those used in the
calculation of allocation, it is suggested that those which may naturally reflect the
market mechanism remain influential even after revision. Similarly, the factors which
are contrary to the market mechanism, such as the share of full-time professional
farmers, become less influential.

Key words: Rice set-aside program, Bureaucrats’ discretion, Uneven allocations, Public
choice, Political actors

JEL classification: Q180, H890



More intriguing information

1. Towards a Mirror System for the Development of Socially-Mediated Skills
2. How does an infant acquire the ability of joint attention?: A Constructive Approach
3. Reform of the EU Sugar Regime: Impacts on Sugar Production in Ireland
4. An Interview with Thomas J. Sargent
5. A Multimodal Framework for Computer Mediated Learning: The Reshaping of Curriculum Knowledge and Learning
6. An Investigation of transience upon mothers of primary-aged children and their school
7. Unilateral Actions the Case of International Environmental Problems
8. On Dictatorship, Economic Development and Stability
9. The name is absent
10. American trade policy towards Sub Saharan Africa –- a meta analysis of AGOA