on the model with a drift only. The unit root null hypothesis is rejected at conventional levels
for all series in first differences.
Table 2. DF-GLS unit root tests on the first differences of series
Variables |
Specification |
Lags |
Test statistic |
∆lnIPI |
constant |
4 |
- 1.986 |
∆lnPPI |
constant |
2 |
- 3.680 |
∆lnM1A |
constant |
1 |
- 6.633 |
∆lnXREURO |
constant |
1 |
- 6.753 |
The critical values for 0.95 (0.99) confidence levels with constant are -1.944 (-2.592), with constant and trend
are -3.074 (-3.633). The Akaike Information Criteria was used to determine the lag length.
Because the graphical analysis suggests the possibility of structural breaks, that are not
accounted for by the DF-GLS tests, the Zivot-Andrews unit root test in the presence of
structural breaks is used to double-check the series (table 3).
Table 3. Andrews - Zivot unit root tests
Variable |
Structural break |
Lags |
Possible break |
Test statistic |
lnPPI |
intercept only |
0 |
2001:06 |
- 3.783 |
trend only |
0 |
2000:09 |
- 2.506 | |
both |
0 |
2001:06 |
- 3.825 | |
lnIPI |
intercept only |
1 |
2003:06 |
- 2.557 |
trend only |
1 |
1998:03 |
- 2.413 | |
both |
1 |
2001:05 |
- 2.865 | |
lnXREUR O |
intercept only |
2 |
2001:05 |
- 3.717 |
trend only |
2 |
1998:09 |
- 3.278 | |
both |
2 |
1998:08 |
- 3.263 | |
lnM1A |
intercept only |
0 |
2003:07 |
- 2.208 |
trend only |
0 |
1998:03 |
- 3.655 | |
both |
0 |
1998:08 |
- 2.876 |
The critical values for 0.95 (0.99) confidence levels in case of a structural break in the intercept only, are -4.80
(-5.34), trend only -4.42 (-4.93), and both -5.08 (-5.57). The Schwarz Bayesian criterion was used to determine
the lag length.
10
More intriguing information
1. Consumer Networks and Firm Reputation: A First Experimental Investigation2. The name is absent
3. ALTERNATIVE TRADE POLICIES
4. Smith and Rawls Share a Room
5. Une Classe de Concepts
6. The name is absent
7. The name is absent
8. The name is absent
9. Intertemporal Risk Management Decisions of Farmers under Preference, Market, and Policy Dynamics
10. Staying on the Dole