The name is absent



TABLES

Table 1. Distribution of Mothers of Millennium Cohort by Age at the Birth of their
First Child*

Age at Motherhood ( years)

Total
(%)

Up to 18
(%)

19 to 21
(%)

22 to 24
(%)

25 to 27
(%)

28 to 30
(%)

31 plus
(%)

As percentage of all mothers having first births

Weighted row percents

9.3

13.9

11.1

15.1

21.0

29.5

100.0

Unweighted sample size

860

1296

982

^∏31

1435

1925

7629

As percentage of all survey mothers

Weighted row percents

11.4

17.1

14.3

17.3

18.7

21.3

100.0

Unweighted sample size

2544

3712

2944

3026

3038

3253

18517

The sample is natural mothers; * the first child is the first live born child who ever lived with the mother where
age at first birth known. percentages in this and following tables are weighted by uk weights
.

Table 2. Some features of family structure by age at motherhood

Family Structure

Age at motherhood

Total

(%)

Up to 18
(%)

19 to 21
(%)

22 to 24
(%)

25 to 27
(%)

28 to 30
(%)

31 plus
(%)

All mothers__________________

Natural mother only_______________

39.0

25.5

13.6

6.9

4.8

4.3

13.8

Presence of half/step siblings in
household_______________________

22.2

17.8

13.7

7.0

3.9

2.8

10.1

Married, first or later________________

23.8

39.4

57.0

73.0

79.6

78.5

61.7

Cohabiting_______________________

37.2

35.1

29.4

20.1

15.6

17.2

24.3

Grandparents of cohort child live
in household______________________

14.3

11.2

7.2

4.2

2.4

1.9

6.1

Maximum unweighted sample size

2544

3712

2944

3026

3038

3253

18517

Lone mothers relationship patterns where cohort child is first live born_______________________________

Divorced or separated from baby’s
father______________________________

28.1

35.6

41.7

46.2

50.9

43.2

37.0

Never lived with baby’s father

71.9

64.4

58.3

53.8

49.1

56.8

63.0

Maximum unweighted sample size

493

513

228

116

100

127

1577

Lone mothers relationship patterns for all birth orders_______________________________________________

Divorced or separated from cohort
baby’s father_______________________

38.7

42.4

48.3

51.4

54.5

47.5

43.9

Never lived with cohort baby’s
father______________________________

61.3

57.6

51.7

48.6

45.5

52.5

56.1

Maximum unweighted sample size

1064

1025

477

256

174

179

3175

34



More intriguing information

1. The name is absent
2. A novel selective 11b-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 inhibitor prevents human adipogenesis
3. Julkinen T&K-rahoitus ja sen vaikutus yrityksiin - Analyysi metalli- ja elektroniikkateollisuudesta
4. The name is absent
5. The Structure Performance Hypothesis and The Efficient Structure Performance Hypothesis-Revisited: The Case of Agribusiness Commodity and Food Products Truck Carriers in the South
6. The name is absent
7. Analyse des verbraucherorientierten Qualitätsurteils mittels assoziativer Verfahren am Beispiel von Schweinefleisch und Kartoffeln
8. The name is absent
9. The name is absent
10. Achieving the MDGs – A Note
11. Quality Enhancement for E-Learning Courses: The Role of Student Feedback
12. Knowledge, Innovation and Agglomeration - regionalized multiple indicators and evidence from Brazil
13. Economic Evaluation of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) in Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), CHERE Working Paper 2007/6
14. Imputing Dairy Producers' Quota Discount Rate Using the Individual Export Milk Program in Quebec
15. Do imputed education histories provide satisfactory results in fertility analysis in the Western German context?
16. Distribution of aggregate income in Portugal from 1995 to 2000 within a SAM (Social Accounting Matrix) framework. Modeling the household sector
17. The name is absent
18. Epistemology and conceptual resources for the development of learning technologies
19. Improvement of Access to Data Sets from the Official Statistics
20. CONSIDERATIONS CONCERNING THE ROLE OF ACCOUNTING AS INFORMATIONAL SYSTEM AND ASSISTANCE OF DECISION