The name is absent



Table 3. Financial circumstances of MCS families by age at Motherhood

Financial circumstances

Age at motherhood

Total
(%)

Up to 18
(%)

19-21
(%)

22-24
(%)

25-27
(%)

28-30
(%)

31 +
(%)

Below 60% median income*___________

67.1

52.3

31.6

16.7

10.2

7.5

27.5

Receives one or more means tested
benefits**________________________________

75.9

62.9

43.2

24.2

15.7

12.3

35.3

Mother’s evaluation of family’s Current financial situation___________________________________________________________

Experiencing financial difficulties_________

51.8

49.3

41.2

33.2

28.1

25.5

36.6

Employment

Workless couple families________________

26.0

15.1

7.7

3.5

2.2

2.4

7.1

Workless lone parent families____________

86.5

78.7

74.6

64.1

55.1

42.4

75.4

Mother employed full time______________

4.0

6.1

10.2

12.9

18.3

21.9

13.3

Mother employed part time______________

16.7

24.7

35.4

41.5

43.4

41.4

35.2

Well-being_________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Low life satisfaction (6 or less out of 10)

32.0

25.4

22.0

14.2

13.4

12.7

18.7

Malaise (3 or more out of 9)______________

30.9

27.5

26.0

21.7

19.0

19.8

23.4

Maximum unweighted sample size_______

2544

3712

2944

3026

3038

3253

18517

*Family income ( of single parent or couple ) has been equivalized using number of resident parents, and resident
dependent children, uniform rate for those under 16, and additional adult rate for any over 16

**Receiving one or more of the following: Jobseekers Allowance, Income Support, Working Families Tax Credit or
Disabled Persons Tax Credit

Table 4. Some contextual indicators of where MCS families live by age at Motherhood

Environment

Age at motherhood

Total
(%)

Up to 18
(%)

19-21
(%)

22-24
(%)

25-27
(%)

28-30
(%)

31 +
(%)

Local Authority tenant____________________

43.6

31.6

18.1

7.6

4.6

3.2

15.8

Living in a flat_____________________________

21.7

20.0

12.9

8.8

8.8

8.8

12.8

No access to a garden____________________

18.9

16.6

10.1

7.1

5.7

5.1

9.8

Dissatisfied with area living in______________

21.3

14.4

10.2

7.8

6.5

5.6

10.1

Rubbish and litter is very common_________

22.4

14.8

9.3

6.3

5.4

5.7

9.7

Lives in a disadvantaged or ethnic area

61.3

56.7

47.6

34.2

26.2

23.5

39.3

Maximum unweighted sample size_________

2544

3712

2944

3026

3038

3253

18517

35



More intriguing information

1. Backpropagation Artificial Neural Network To Detect Hyperthermic Seizures In Rats
2. Heterogeneity of Investors and Asset Pricing in a Risk-Value World
3. Sex-gender-sexuality: how sex, gender, and sexuality constellations are constituted in secondary schools
4. On the Real Exchange Rate Effects of Higher Electricity Prices in South Africa
5. The Effects of Reforming the Chinese Dual-Track Price System
6. Towards Learning Affective Body Gesture
7. The name is absent
8. ESTIMATION OF EFFICIENT REGRESSION MODELS FOR APPLIED AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS RESEARCH
9. Protocol for Past BP: a randomised controlled trial of different blood pressure targets for people with a history of stroke of transient ischaemic attack (TIA) in primary care
10. The name is absent