Table 3. Financial circumstances of MCS families by age at Motherhood
|
Financial circumstances |
Age at motherhood |
Total | |||||
|
Up to 18 |
19-21 |
22-24 |
25-27 |
28-30 |
31 + | ||
|
Below 60% median income*___________ |
67.1 |
52.3 |
31.6 |
16.7 |
10.2 |
7.5 |
27.5 |
|
Receives one or more means tested |
75.9 |
62.9 |
43.2 |
24.2 |
15.7 |
12.3 |
35.3 |
|
Mother’s evaluation of family’s Current financial situation___________________________________________________________ | |||||||
|
Experiencing financial difficulties_________ |
51.8 |
49.3 |
41.2 |
33.2 |
28.1 |
25.5 |
36.6 |
|
Employment | |||||||
|
Workless couple families________________ |
26.0 |
15.1 |
7.7 |
3.5 |
2.2 |
2.4 |
7.1 |
|
Workless lone parent families____________ |
86.5 |
78.7 |
74.6 |
64.1 |
55.1 |
42.4 |
75.4 |
|
Mother employed full time______________ |
4.0 |
6.1 |
10.2 |
12.9 |
18.3 |
21.9 |
13.3 |
|
Mother employed part time______________ |
16.7 |
24.7 |
35.4 |
41.5 |
43.4 |
41.4 |
35.2 |
|
Well-being_________________________________________________________________________________________________________ | |||||||
|
Low life satisfaction (6 or less out of 10) |
32.0 |
25.4 |
22.0 |
14.2 |
13.4 |
12.7 |
18.7 |
|
Malaise (3 or more out of 9)______________ |
30.9 |
27.5 |
26.0 |
21.7 |
19.0 |
19.8 |
23.4 |
|
Maximum unweighted sample size_______ |
2544 |
3712 |
2944 |
3026 |
3038 |
3253 |
18517 |
*Family income ( of single parent or couple ) has been equivalized using number of resident parents, and resident
dependent children, uniform rate for those under 16, and additional adult rate for any over 16
**Receiving one or more of the following: Jobseekers Allowance, Income Support, Working Families Tax Credit or
Disabled Persons Tax Credit
Table 4. Some contextual indicators of where MCS families live by age at Motherhood
|
Environment |
Age at motherhood |
Total | |||||
|
Up to 18 |
19-21 |
22-24 |
25-27 |
28-30 |
31 + | ||
|
Local Authority tenant____________________ |
43.6 |
31.6 |
18.1 |
7.6 |
4.6 |
3.2 |
15.8 |
|
Living in a flat_____________________________ |
21.7 |
20.0 |
12.9 |
8.8 |
8.8 |
8.8 |
12.8 |
|
No access to a garden____________________ |
18.9 |
16.6 |
10.1 |
7.1 |
5.7 |
5.1 |
9.8 |
|
Dissatisfied with area living in______________ |
21.3 |
14.4 |
10.2 |
7.8 |
6.5 |
5.6 |
10.1 |
|
Rubbish and litter is very common_________ |
22.4 |
14.8 |
9.3 |
6.3 |
5.4 |
5.7 |
9.7 |
|
Lives in a disadvantaged or ethnic area |
61.3 |
56.7 |
47.6 |
34.2 |
26.2 |
23.5 |
39.3 |
|
Maximum unweighted sample size_________ |
2544 |
3712 |
2944 |
3026 |
3038 |
3253 |
18517 |
35
More intriguing information
1. Testing Hypotheses in an I(2) Model with Applications to the Persistent Long Swings in the Dmk/$ Rate2. An Interview with Thomas J. Sargent
3. The demand for urban transport: An application of discrete choice model for Cadiz
4. The name is absent
5. The name is absent
6. Benefits of travel time savings for freight transportation : beyond the costs
7. The name is absent
8. Heavy Hero or Digital Dummy: multimodal player-avatar relations in FINAL FANTASY 7
9. A Rational Analysis of Alternating Search and Reflection Strategies in Problem Solving
10. Tourism in Rural Areas and Regional Development Planning