The name is absent



Table 7. Analysis of the Presence of a Partner at Interview: all natural mothers with valid data

Partner Currently Present

Probit

Age at motherhood__________________________

Model (1)

Model (2)

Model (3)

Reference category: up to 18 years_________________

t

t

t

______________________________________19 to 21 (agefst2)

0.364

(8.11)***

0.284

(6.18)***

0.205

(4.17)***

___________________________________22 to 24 (agefst3)

0.821

(17.54)***

0.720

(14.99)***

0.583

(11.45)***

___________________________________25 to 27 (agefst4)

1.214

(21.69)***

1.099

(18.24)***

0.898

(14.42)***

___________________________________28 to 30 (agefst5)

1.409

(22.59)***

1.279

(20.22)***

1.074

(16.73)***

______________________________________31 to 33 (agefst6)

1.531

(23.49)***

1.379

(20.27)***

1.166

(15.09)***

___________________________________34 to 36 (agefst7)

1.393

(17.65)***

1.257

(15.67)***

1.070

(11.94)***

____________________________________37 plus (agefst8)

1.204

(10.34)***

1.078

(8.62)***

0.894

(6.61)***

Childhood Factors____________________________

Mother’s parents ever separated or divorced
(fpasebi)_______________________________________________

-0.113

(3.34)***

-0.070

(1.96)*

Mother ever in care during childhood (incare)_______

-0.046

(0.44)

-0.031

(0.30)

Mother left school at minimum age (compsch)______

-0.265

(8.73)***

-0.099

(2.91)***

Ethnic origin: reference category White_____________

____________________________________Mixed (eth2)

-0.439

(2.78)***

-0.401

(2.37)***

________________________________________Indian (eth3)

0.467

(3.58)***

0.703

(4.89)***

_____________________________________Pakistani (eth4)

0.432

(3.86)***

0.815

(6.57)***

________________________________Bangladeshi (eth5)

0.762

(7.53)***

1.109

(10.44)***

____________________________Black Caribbean (eth6)

-1.011

(8.48)***

-1.011

(8.06)***

_______________________________Black African (eth7)

-0.989

(8.22)***

-0.894

(7.38)***

_________________________________________Other (eth8)

-0.114

(0.85)

0.127

(0.77)

Contemporary Factors_______________________

Country: reference category England_______________

__________________________________Wales (curreg10)

-0.107

(2.33)**

_______________________________Scotland (curreg11)

-0.079

(1.68)*

________________________Northern Ireland (curreg12)

-0.178

(3.26)***

Mother Employed when pregnant with cohort child
(emppreg)______________________________________

0.331

(10.70)***

Highest Qualification: reference None______________

__________________NVQ level 1 or equivalent (nvq 1)

0.141

(2.39)**

__________________NVQ level 2 or equivalent(nvq2)

0.364

(7.56)***

__________________NVQ level 3 or equivalent(nvq3)

0.313

(4.65)***

__________________NVQ level 4 or equivalent(nvq4)

0.560

(9.01)***

_________________NVQ level 5 or equivalent (nvq5)

0.842

(6.76)***

_____________Overseas and other unclassified (nvq6)

0.216

(2.20)**

Total number of children in family (totlivch)_________

0.222

(14.99)***

Long standing illness, mother (longill)_______________

-0.052

(1.44)

Area Type: reference Advantaged_________________

______________________Disadvantaged ward (area2)

-0.270

(7.02)***

_______________________________Ethnic Ward (area3)

-0.433

(5.46)***

Constant_________________________________________

0.281

(8.02)***

0.579

(12.09)***

-0.193

(2.29)**

Observations___________________________________

17814______________

17814________________

17814_______________

F______________________________________

155.11

0.0000

82.26

0.0000

54.60

0.0000

Absolute value of t statistics in parentheses * significant at 10%; ** significant at 5%; *** significant at 1%

Partner includes partners reported as part time

Similar results are obtained if use those for whom the cohort member is their first birth

38



More intriguing information

1. Effects of a Sport Education Intervention on Students’ Motivational Responses in Physical Education
2. Macroeconomic Interdependence in a Two-Country DSGE Model under Diverging Interest-Rate Rules
3. Three Strikes and You.re Out: Reply to Cooper and Willis
4. International Financial Integration*
5. The name is absent
6. Nach der Einführung von Arbeitslosengeld II: deutlich mehr Verlierer als Gewinner unter den Hilfeempfängern
7. Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on Epigenetic Robotics
8. The name is absent
9. The name is absent
10. Improving behaviour classification consistency: a technique from biological taxonomy