The name is absent



Table 9. Analysis of the probability of the mother being employed at interview: all mothers

Employment of Mother

Probit

Age at motherhood

Model (1)

Model (2)

Model (3)

Reference category: up to 18 years

t

t

t

19 to 21 (agefst2)

0.329

(7.32)***

0.293

(6.57)***

0.174

(3.72)***

22 to 24 (agefst3)

0.712

(13.92)***

0.649

(12.75)***

0.414

(8.00)***

______________________________________25 to 27 (agefst4)

0.961

(20.42)***

0.829

(16.72)***

0.485

(9.64)***

28 to 30 (agefst5)

1.128

(22.42)***

0.964

(17.86)***

0.535

(9.49)***

31 to 33 (agefst6)

1.159

(21.75)***

0.975

(17.29)***

0.516

(8.63)***

34 to 36 (agefst7)

1.202

(20.04)***

1.006

(15.66)***

0.557

(8.29)***

37 plus (agefst8)

1.290

(15.08)***

1.097

(12.32)***

0.629

(6.46)***

Childhood Factors

Mother’s parents ever separated or divorced (fpasebi)

-0.131

(4.87)***

-0.126

(4.55)***

Mother ever in care during childhood (incare)

-0.297

(3.09)***

-0.148

(1.53)

Mother left school at minimum age (compsch)

-0.245

(10.15)***

0.046

(1.56)

Ethnic origin: reference category White

Mixed (eth2)

-0.381

(3.09)***

-0.255

(2.04)**

Indian (eth3)

-0.248

(2.91)***

-0.113

(1.17)

Pakistani (eth4)

-1.05

(13.40)***

-0.804

(8.81)***

Bangladeshi (eth5)

-1.007

(8.18)***

-0.739

(5.32)***

Black Caribbean (eth6)

0.155

(1.59)

0.427

(4.26)***

Black African (eth7)

-0.243

(1.72)*

0.141

(1.05)

Other (eth8)

-0.518

(5.44)***

-0.345

(3.29)***

Contemporary Factors

Country: reference category England

Wales (curreg10)

0.098

(2.57)***

Scotland (curreg11)

0.069

(1.89)*

Northern Ireland (curreg12)

0.214

(5.77)***

Highest Qualification: reference None

NVQ level 1 or equivalent (nvq1)

0.395

(6.84)***

NVQ level 2 or equivalent(nvq2)

0.597

(13.24)***

NVQ level 3 or equivalent(nvq3)

0.746

(14.30)***

NVQ level 4 or equivalent(nvq4)

0.927

(18.25)***

NVQ level 5 or equivalent (nvq5)

0.996

(13.24)***

Overseas and other unclassified (nvq6)

0.170

(1.96)*

Total number of children in family (totlivch)

-0.157

(11.65)***

Long standing illness of mother (longill)

-0.172

(5.37)***

Partner present (partner)

0.536

(14.84)***

Area Type: reference Advantaged

Disadvantaged ward (area2)

-0.029

(0.85)

Ethnic Ward (area3)

-0.259

(3.84)***

Constant

-0.749

(19.78)***

-0.44

(9.70)***

-1.088

(14.49)***

Observations

17818

17818

17818

F

128.38

0.0000     ~

87.24

0.0000

81.52

0.0000

Absolute value of t statistics in parentheses * significant at 10%; ** significant at 5%; *** significant at 1%

Including partner’s nvq and long standing illness does not affect the results significantly for the mother’s employment decisions

41



More intriguing information

1. DIVERSITY OF RURAL PLACES - TEXAS
2. The name is absent
3. Gerontocracy in Motion? – European Cross-Country Evidence on the Labor Market Consequences of Population Ageing
4. Temporary Work in Turbulent Times: The Swedish Experience
5. Anti Microbial Resistance Profile of E. coli isolates From Tropical Free Range Chickens
6. The name is absent
7. TECHNOLOGY AND REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT: THE CASE OF PATENTS AND FIRM LOCATION IN THE SPANISH MEDICAL INSTRUMENTS INDUSTRY.
8. The name is absent
9. The name is absent
10. The name is absent
11. If our brains were simple, we would be too simple to understand them.
12. 03-01 "Read My Lips: More New Tax Cuts - The Distributional Impacts of Repealing Dividend Taxation"
13. The name is absent
14. How does an infant acquire the ability of joint attention?: A Constructive Approach
15. Qualification-Mismatch and Long-Term Unemployment in a Growth-Matching Model
16. The name is absent
17. Auctions in an outcome-based payment scheme to reward ecological services in agriculture – Conception, implementation and results
18. The name is absent
19. Problems of operationalizing the concept of a cost-of-living index
20. The name is absent