Table 10. Families Claiming Means tested benefits+ at Interview (PROBIT): all mothers with valid data
Claming benefits_________________________ |
Probit________________________________________________________________________________ | |||||||
Age at motherhood________________________ |
_______Model (1)_______ |
Model (2) |
Model (3) |
Model (4) | ||||
______________Reference category: up to 18 years |
t |
t |
t |
_t______________ | ||||
__________________________________19 to 21 (agefst2) |
-0.394 |
(8.36)*** |
-0.290 |
(5.97)*** |
0.017 |
(0.28) |
-0.003 |
(0.05) |
________________________________22 to 24 (agefst3) |
-0.921 |
(17.08)*** |
-0.764 |
(14.06)*** |
-0.231 |
(3.74)*** |
-0.239 |
(3.86)*** |
__________________________________25 to 27 (agefst4) |
-1.506 |
(28.79)*** |
-1.279 |
(22.82)*** |
-0.592 |
(8.68)*** |
-0.570 |
(8.33)*** |
________________________________28 to 30 (agefst5) |
-1.791 |
(36.99)*** |
-1.531 |
(30.11)*** |
-0.758 |
(12.43)*** |
-0.706 |
(11.55)*** |
__________________________________31 to 33 (agefst6) |
-1.967 |
(31.25)*** |
-1.681 |
(26.54)*** |
-0.897 |
(12.42)*** |
-0.825 |
(11.16)*** |
__________________________________34 to 36 (agefst7) |
-1.947 |
(24.45)*** |
-1.658 |
(20.57)*** |
-0.897 |
(9.34)*** |
-0.848 |
(8.60)*** |
___________________________________37 plus (agefst8) |
-1.943 |
(19.10)*** |
-1.659 |
(15.92)*** |
-0.930 |
(7.32)*** |
-0.873 |
(6.69)*** |
Childhood Factors___________________________ | ||||||||
Mother’s parents ever separated or divorced |
0.149 |
(4.96)*** |
0.126 |
(4.02)*** |
0.123 |
(3.86)*** | ||
Mother ever in care during childhood (incare)_____ |
0.652 |
(5.47)*** ~ |
0.537 |
(3.93)*** ~ |
0.546 |
(3.98)*** ~ | ||
Mother left school at minimum age (compsch) |
0.461 |
(15.28)*** |
0.202 |
(5.86)*** |
0.165 |
(4.66)*** | ||
Ethnic origin: reference category White_________ | ||||||||
__________________________________Mixed (eth2) |
0.222 |
(1.72)* |
-0.110 |
(0.86) |
-0.093 |
(0.71) | ||
_______________________________________Indian (eth3) |
-0.060 |
(0.54) |
-0.165 |
(1.31) |
-0.106 |
(0.83) | ||
____________________________________Pakistani (eth4) |
0.527 |
(4.98)*** |
0.256 |
(2.35)** |
0.308 |
(2.87)*** | ||
_______________________________Bangladeshi (eth5) |
0.274 |
(2.04)** |
0.069 |
(0.59) |
0.104 |
(0.82) | ||
_________________________Black Caribbean (eth6) |
0.534 |
(3.83)*** |
-0.100 |
(0.82) |
-0.103 |
(0.84) | ||
_____________________________Black African (eth7) |
0.760 |
(4.50)*** |
0.089 |
(0.55) |
0.170 |
(1.01) | ||
_____________________________________Other (eth8) |
0.032 |
(0.32) |
-0.284 |
(2.73)*** |
-0.243 |
(2.33)** | ||
Contemporary Factors______________________ | ||||||||
Country: reference category England____________ | ||||||||
_______________________________Wales (curreg10) |
0.175 |
(3.47)*** |
0.190 |
(3.69)*** | ||||
______________________________Scotland (curreg11) |
0.067 |
(1.24) |
0.082 |
(1.51) | ||||
______________________Northern Ireland (curreg12) |
0.191 |
(3.48)*** |
0.181 |
(3.44)*** | ||||
Employed when pregnant (emppreg)____________ |
-0.288 |
(8.55)*** |
-0.291 |
(8.46)*** | ||||
Highest Qualification: reference None____________ | ||||||||
________________NVQ level 1 or equivalent (nvq1) |
0.081 |
(1.28) |
0.080 |
(1.26) | ||||
________________NVQ level 2 or equivalent(nvq2) |
-0.193 |
(3.46)*** |
-0.173 |
(3.08)*** | ||||
________________NVQ level 3 or equivalent(nvq3) |
-0.220 |
(3.66)*** |
-0.168 |
(2.72)*** |
42
More intriguing information
1. STIMULATING COOPERATION AMONG FARMERS IN A POST-SOCIALIST ECONOMY: LESSONS FROM A PUBLIC-PRIVATE MARKETING PARTNERSHIP IN POLAND2. The name is absent
3. The name is absent
4. Input-Output Analysis, Linear Programming and Modified Multipliers
5. Markets for Influence
6. The name is absent
7. The name is absent
8. The name is absent
9. The Institutional Determinants of Bilateral Trade Patterns
10. The name is absent