The name is absent



Table 10. Families Claiming Means tested benefits+ at Interview (PROBIT): all mothers with valid data

Claming benefits_________________________

Probit________________________________________________________________________________

Age at motherhood________________________

_______Model (1)_______

Model (2)

Model (3)

Model (4)

______________Reference category: up to 18 years

t

t

t

_t______________

__________________________________19 to 21 (agefst2)

-0.394

(8.36)***

-0.290

(5.97)***

0.017

(0.28)

-0.003

(0.05)

________________________________22 to 24 (agefst3)

-0.921

(17.08)***

-0.764

(14.06)***

-0.231

(3.74)***

-0.239

(3.86)***

__________________________________25 to 27 (agefst4)

-1.506

(28.79)***

-1.279

(22.82)***

-0.592

(8.68)***

-0.570

(8.33)***

________________________________28 to 30 (agefst5)

-1.791

(36.99)***

-1.531

(30.11)***

-0.758

(12.43)***

-0.706

(11.55)***

__________________________________31 to 33 (agefst6)

-1.967

(31.25)***

-1.681

(26.54)***

-0.897

(12.42)***

-0.825

(11.16)***

__________________________________34 to 36 (agefst7)

-1.947

(24.45)***

-1.658

(20.57)***

-0.897

(9.34)***

-0.848

(8.60)***

___________________________________37 plus (agefst8)

-1.943

(19.10)***

-1.659

(15.92)***

-0.930

(7.32)***

-0.873

(6.69)***

Childhood Factors___________________________

Mother’s parents ever separated or divorced
(fpasebi)___________________________________________

0.149

(4.96)***

0.126

(4.02)***

0.123

(3.86)***

Mother ever in care during childhood (incare)_____

0.652

(5.47)***  ~

0.537

(3.93)*** ~

0.546

(3.98)*** ~

Mother left school at minimum age (compsch)

0.461

(15.28)***

0.202

(5.86)***

0.165

(4.66)***

Ethnic origin: reference category White_________

__________________________________Mixed (eth2)

0.222

(1.72)*

-0.110

(0.86)

-0.093

(0.71)

_______________________________________Indian (eth3)

-0.060

(0.54)

-0.165

(1.31)

-0.106

(0.83)

____________________________________Pakistani (eth4)

0.527

(4.98)***

0.256

(2.35)**

0.308

(2.87)***

_______________________________Bangladeshi (eth5)

0.274

(2.04)**

0.069

(0.59)

0.104

(0.82)

_________________________Black Caribbean (eth6)

0.534

(3.83)***

-0.100

(0.82)

-0.103

(0.84)

_____________________________Black African (eth7)

0.760

(4.50)***

0.089

(0.55)

0.170

(1.01)

_____________________________________Other (eth8)

0.032

(0.32)

-0.284

(2.73)***

-0.243

(2.33)**

Contemporary Factors______________________

Country: reference category England____________

_______________________________Wales (curreg10)

0.175

(3.47)***

0.190

(3.69)***

______________________________Scotland (curreg11)

0.067

(1.24)

0.082

(1.51)

______________________Northern Ireland (curreg12)

0.191

(3.48)***

0.181

(3.44)***

Employed when pregnant (emppreg)____________

-0.288

(8.55)***

-0.291

(8.46)***

Highest Qualification: reference None____________

________________NVQ level 1 or equivalent (nvq1)

0.081

(1.28)

0.080

(1.26)

________________NVQ level 2 or equivalent(nvq2)

-0.193

(3.46)***

-0.173

(3.08)***

________________NVQ level 3 or equivalent(nvq3)

-0.220

(3.66)***

-0.168

(2.72)***

42



More intriguing information

1. ISSUES IN NONMARKET VALUATION AND POLICY APPLICATION: A RETROSPECTIVE GLANCE
2. Passing the burden: corporate tax incidence in open economies
3. Evidence on the Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment: The Case of Three European Regions
4. Bargaining Power and Equilibrium Consumption
5. Towards a framework for critical citizenship education
6. Testing the Information Matrix Equality with Robust Estimators
7. A Study of Adult 'Non-Singers' In Newfoundland
8. Family, social security and social insurance: General remarks and the present discussion in Germany as a case study
9. The name is absent
10. The name is absent
11. KNOWLEDGE EVOLUTION
12. PEER-REVIEWED FINAL EDITED VERSION OF ARTICLE PRIOR TO PUBLICATION
13. Voluntary Teaming and Effort
14. Comparison of Optimal Control Solutions in a Labor Market Model
15. The name is absent
16. Structure and objectives of Austria's foreign direct investment in the four adjacent Central and Eastern European countries Hungary, the Czech Republic, Slovenia and Slovakia
17. The name is absent
18. The name is absent
19. A Review of Kuhnian and Lakatosian “Explanations” in Economics
20. Constrained School Choice