Table 6. Analysis of Age at Motherhood in terms of factors from childhood
|
Age at Motherhood in 8 groups of 3 year bands up to 37+ (agefstm)__________________________________ |
Ordered Probit |
Ordered Probit |
Ordered Probit | |||
|
Childhood Factors______________________ |
t |
t |
t | |||
|
Mother’s parents ever separated or divorced |
-0.376 |
(17.35)*** |
-0.436 |
(13.45)*** |
-0.383 |
(12.21)*** |
|
Mother ever in care during childhood (incare) |
-0.679 |
(6.92)*** ~ |
-0.482 |
(3.95)*** ~ |
-0.345 |
(2.88)*** ~ |
|
Mother left school at minimum age (compsch) |
-0.732 |
(26.65)*** |
-0.610 |
(16.20)*** |
-0.533 |
(14.18)*** |
|
Ethnic origin: reference category White_________ | ||||||
|
________________________________Mixed (eth2) |
-0.309 |
(3.30)*** |
-0.318 |
(2.23)** |
-0.238 |
(1.68)* |
|
____________________________________Indian (eth3) |
-0.277 |
(4.53)*** |
-0.246 |
(2.85)*** |
-0.127 |
(1.44) |
|
___________________________________Pakistani (eth4) |
-0.572 |
(12.61)*** |
-0.694 |
(9.68)*** |
-0.490 |
(6.93)*** |
|
____________________________Bangladeshi (eth5) |
-0.900 |
(19.48)*** |
-0.860 |
(12.94)*** |
-0.692 |
(6.56)*** |
|
________________________Black Caribbean (eth6) |
-0.202 |
(1.82)* |
-0.010 |
(0.06) |
0.136 |
(0.86) |
|
___________________________Black African (eth7) |
-0.132 |
(1.88)* |
-0.003 |
(0.02) |
0.255 |
(1.91)* |
|
_____________________________________Other (eth8) |
-0.033 |
(0.45) |
0.073 |
(0.71) |
0.201 |
(2.20)** |
|
Current Factors_________________________ | ||||||
|
Region: reference category England___________ | ||||||
|
_______________________________Movers (reg1) |
-0.552 |
(11.34)*** | ||||
|
_________________________________Wales (reg11) |
-0.141 |
(2.56)** | ||||
|
________________________________Scotland (reg12) |
-0.037 |
(-0.63) | ||||
|
_______________________Northern Ireland (reg13) |
-0.234 |
(4.00)*** | ||||
|
Area Type: reference Advantaged______________ | ||||||
|
___________________Disadvantaged ward (area2) |
-0.404 |
(7.66)*** | ||||
|
___________________________Ethnic Ward (area3) |
-0.426 |
(5.04)*** | ||||
|
Observations__________________________________ |
18463 |
7563 |
7563 | |||
|
F____________________________________ |
161.53 |
0.0000 |
94.68 |
0.0000 |
81.20 |
0.0000 ~ |
|
Cut Points______________________________ | ||||||
|
_________________________________________Cut 1 |
-1.826 |
(64.12)*** ~ |
-1.851 |
(52.10)*** ~ |
-2.124 |
(47.56)*** ~ |
|
_______________________________________Cut 2 |
-1.112 |
(41.28)*** |
-1.190 |
(37.68)*** |
-1.426 |
(36.41)*** |
|
_________________________________________Cut 3 |
-0.678 |
(24.00)*** |
-0.826 |
(25.44)*** |
-1.037 |
(26.49)*** |
|
_______________________________________Cut 4 |
-0.194 |
(6.23)*** |
-0.441 |
(11.39)*** |
-0.587 |
(14.04)*** |
|
_______________________________________Cut 5 |
0.394 |
(12.07)*** |
0.187 |
(5.22)*** |
0.023 |
(0.57) |
|
_______________________________________Cut 6 |
0.983 |
(33.97)*** |
0.770 |
(22.97)*** |
0.617 |
(16.19)*** |
|
_______________________________________Cut 7 |
1.603 |
(57.69)*** |
1.380 |
(38.97)*** |
1.227 |
(30.88)*** |
Absolute value of t statistics in parentheses * significant at 10%; ** significant at 5%; *** significant at 1%
Similar results are obtained if exclude those who gave birth at or before the compulsory school leaving age
37
More intriguing information
1. THE USE OF EXTRANEOUS INFORMATION IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF A POLICY SIMULATION MODEL2. Existentialism: a Philosophy of Hope or Despair?
3. Evaluation of the Development Potential of Russian Cities
4. An alternative way to model merit good arguments
5. The Variable-Rate Decision for Multiple Inputs with Multiple Management Zones
6. Consciousness, cognition, and the hierarchy of context: extending the global neuronal workspace model
7. Linkages between research, scholarship and teaching in universities in China
8. Policy Formulation, Implementation and Feedback in EU Merger Control
9. Spectral density bandwith choice and prewightening in the estimation of heteroskadasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrices in panel data models
10. The Employment Impact of Differences in Dmand and Production