The name is absent



________________NVQ level 3 or equivalent(nvq3)

0.393

(7.43)***

0.336

(6.65)***

________________NVQ level 4 or equivalent(nvq4)

0.702

(13.98)***

0.563

(11.52)***

_______________NVQ level 5 or equivalent (nvq5)

1.159

(14.69)***

0.852

(10.37)***

___________Overseas and other unclassified (nvq6)

0.023

(0.27)

-0.020

(0.23)

Total number of children in family (totlivch)______

-0.096

(7.37)***

-0.106

(7.95)***

Long standing illness, mother (longill)_____________

-0.100

(3.65)***

-0.087

(3.24)***

Partner present (partner)___________________________

0.354

(5.94)***

0.215

(3.25)***

Partner employed (partem)______________________

1.293

(26.46)***

1.232

(25.23)***

Area Type: reference Advantaged_______________

_____________________Disadvantaged ward (area2)

-0.270

(7.69)***

-0.236

(7.06)***

____________________________Ethnic Ward (area3)

-0.294

(2.57)***

-0.241

(2.15)**

Partner’s Highest Qualification: reference

None/no partner_____________________________

_______________NVQ level 1 or equivalent (nvqf1)

-0.002

(0.03)

________________NVQ level 2 or equivalent(nvqf2)

0.152

(3.36)***

_______________NVQ level 3 or equivalent(nvqf3)

0.255

(5.73)***

________________NVQ level 4 or equivalent(nvqf4)

0.560

(11.44)***

______________NVQ level 5 or equivalent (nvqf5)

0.907

(12.66)***

__________Overseas and other unclassified (nvqf6)

0.190

(2.27)**

Long standing illness, partner (longillp)____________

-0.110

(3.65)***

Observations________________________________

14723

14723

14723

14723

F___________________________________

392.16

0.0000

182.04

0.0000

135.81

0.0000

125.76

0.0000     ~

Absolute value of t statistics in parentheses * significant at 10%; ** significant at 5%; *** significant at 1%

Equivalised Incomes grouped in four groups £0-£150, £150-£300, £300-£450 & £450+; Income adjusted for family composition on McClements equivalence scale
Cut points available on request

47



More intriguing information

1. Whatever happened to competition in space agency procurement? The case of NASA
2. The name is absent
3. Dendritic Inhibition Enhances Neural Coding Properties
4. The name is absent
5. Integrating the Structural Auction Approach and Traditional Measures of Market Power
6. Feeling Good about Giving: The Benefits (and Costs) of Self-Interested Charitable Behavior
7. The name is absent
8. Spatial patterns in intermunicipal Danish commuting
9. Density Estimation and Combination under Model Ambiguity
10. Disturbing the fiscal theory of the price level: Can it fit the eu-15?