Table 13. Analysis of Mother’s Satisfaction with her Life So Far
Mother's Life Satisfaction: rated 7 or |
Probit | |||||||
Age at motherhood________________________ |
_______Model (1)_______ |
Model (2) |
Model (3) |
Model (4) | ||||
_______________Reference category: up to 18 years |
________t________ |
________t________ |
t |
_t______________ | ||||
__________________________________19 to 21 (agefst2) |
0.178 |
(4.05)*** |
0.138 |
(3.15)*** |
0.060 |
(1.35) |
0.056 |
(1.28) |
________________________________22 to 24 (agefst3) |
0.278 |
(6.51)*** |
0.215 |
(4.85)*** |
0.032 |
(0.70) |
0.003 |
(0.06) |
__________________________________25 to 27 (agefst4) |
0.599 |
(12.80)*** |
0.503 |
(10.39)*** |
0.246 |
(4.85)*** |
0.185 |
(3.63)*** |
________________________________28 to 30 (agefst5) |
0.640 |
(14.00)*** |
0.527 |
(11.01)*** |
0.217 |
(4.12)*** |
0.125 |
(2.36)** |
__________________________________31 to 33 (agefst6) |
0.710 |
(12.67)*** |
0.581 |
(10.07)*** |
0.255 |
(4.02)*** |
0.144 |
(2.23)** |
__________________________________34 to 36 (agefst7) |
0.592 |
(9.33)*** |
0.464 |
(6.90)*** |
0.151 |
(2.10)** |
0.037 |
(0.52) |
___________________________________37 plus (agefst8) |
0.629 |
(7.12)*** |
0.500 |
(5.38)*** |
0.185 |
(1.88)* |
0.070 |
(0.72) |
Childhood Factors___________________________ | ||||||||
Mother’s parents ever separated or divorced |
-0.121 |
(3.77)** |
-0.100 |
(2.96)*** |
-0.095 |
(2.76)*** | ||
Mother ever in care during childhood (incare)_____ |
-0.400 |
(3.78)** ~ |
-0.339 |
(3.15)*** ~ |
-0.330 |
(3.03)*** ~ | ||
Mother left school at minimum age (compsch) |
-0.144 |
(4.93)*** |
-0.005 |
(0.15) |
0.010 |
(0.28) | ||
Ethnic origin: reference category White___________ | ||||||||
__________________________________Mixed (eth2) |
-0.167 |
(1.23) |
-0.118 |
(0.85) |
-0.107 |
(0.79) | ||
_______________________________________Indian (eth3) |
-0.439 |
(5.25)*** |
-0.461 |
(5.28)*** |
-0.443 |
(5.10)*** | ||
____________________________________Pakistani (eth4) |
-0.194 |
(2.42)** |
-0.154 |
(1.63) |
-0.107 |
(1.10) | ||
_______________________________Bangladeshi (eth5) |
-0.136 |
(0.82) |
-0.128 |
(0.66) |
-0.079 |
(0.40) | ||
_________________________Black Caribbean (eth6) |
-0.330 |
(2.72)*** |
-0.141 |
(1.14) |
-0.130 |
(1.04) | ||
_____________________________Black African (eth7) |
-0.402 |
(3.30)*** |
-0.203 |
(1.90)* |
-0.169 |
(1.61) | ||
_____________________________________Other (eth8) |
-0.249 |
(2.05)** |
-0.211 |
(1.70)* |
-0.196 |
(1.61) | ||
Contemporary Factors______________________ | ||||||||
Country: reference category England____________ | ||||||||
_______________________________Wales (curreg10) |
0.042 |
(0.91) |
0.056 |
(1.21) | ||||
______________________________Scotland (curreg11) |
0.064 |
(1.78)* |
0.077 |
(2.18)** | ||||
______________________Northern Ireland (curreg12) |
-0.017 |
(0.33) |
0.003 |
(0.06) | ||||
Employed when pregnant (emppreg)____________ |
0.108 |
(3.75)*** |
0.071 |
(2.45)*** | ||||
Highest Qualification: reference None____________ | ||||||||
________________NVQ level 1 or equivalent (nvq1) |
-0.023 |
(0.45) |
-0.026 |
(0.50) |
48
More intriguing information
1. Bargaining Power and Equilibrium Consumption2. THE CHANGING RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
3. Neighborhood Effects, Public Housing and Unemployment in France
4. The name is absent
5. The name is absent
6. The name is absent
7. Smith and Rawls Share a Room
8. ISSUES IN NONMARKET VALUATION AND POLICY APPLICATION: A RETROSPECTIVE GLANCE
9. GOVERNANÇA E MECANISMOS DE CONTROLE SOCIAL EM REDES ORGANIZACIONAIS
10. Studies on association of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi with gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus and its effect on improvement of sorghum bicolor (L.)