Natural hazard mitigation in Southern California



Abstract

Human society has always been threatened by natural disaster. Of old, these were perceived as
acts of God or as mystical forces. During the last decades, scholars realized that they were
caused by an incorrect adaptation of human life to the natural world, thereby making natural
hazards the terrain of, among others, urban planners. Since more people will be at risk from
natural hazards in the future, it is important for planners to integrate natural hazard mitigation
into common planning practice.

A literature review reveals the requirements for high quality natural hazard mitigation. Among
the most important demands are the need to embed mitigation in a comprehensive planning
program, the need to start the mitigation planning process as early as possible and the need for
public participation and full partnerships among government levels and institutions. Mitigation
plans require a strong factual basis in the form of a risk assessment.

In the US, the Federal Emergency Management Agency FEMA regulates many mitigation
programs and funds and aims to provide the impetus for state and local governments to include
natural hazard mitigation in their planning process. However, many FEMA policies actually
subsidize risk instead of minimizing it. The State of California established numerous natural
hazard mitigation programs. These programs have to be implemented by local governments but
unfortunately, the State lacks authority to enforce a strict enforcement of these regulations.
Local governments are therefore not encouraged enough to undertake effective mitigation
efforts.

A case study of Orange County and Los Angeles County shows that cities indeed do not
succeed to create effective natural hazard mitigation plans. This is truly regrettable, since both
counties are highly urbanized and located in a multi-hazard high-risk area. The potential losses
in case of a natural hazard event such as a major earthquake are enormous. Governments of all
levels should therefore start to focus more on effective natural hazard mitigation in order to
prevent future disasters.

ii



More intriguing information

1. A Principal Components Approach to Cross-Section Dependence in Panels
2. TOMOGRAPHIC IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION OF FAN-BEAM PROJECTIONS WITH EQUIDISTANT DETECTORS USING PARTIALLY CONNECTED NEURAL NETWORKS
3. Gender and headship in the twenty-first century
4. Demographic Features, Beliefs And Socio-Psychological Impact Of Acne Vulgaris Among Its Sufferers In Two Towns In Nigeria
5. HOW WILL PRODUCTION, MARKETING, AND CONSUMPTION BE COORDINATED? FROM A FARM ORGANIZATION VIEWPOINT
6. Sectoral specialisation in the EU a macroeconomic perspective
7. The name is absent
8. The name is absent
9. A Brief Introduction to the Guidance Theory of Representation
10. Imperfect competition and congestion in the City
11. Update to a program for saving a model fit as a dataset
12. Implementation of a 3GPP LTE Turbo Decoder Accelerator on GPU
13. Iconic memory or icon?
14. The name is absent
15. Learning and Endogenous Business Cycles in a Standard Growth Model
16. The Environmental Kuznets Curve Under a New framework: Role of Social Capital in Water Pollution
17. TECHNOLOGY AND REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT: THE CASE OF PATENTS AND FIRM LOCATION IN THE SPANISH MEDICAL INSTRUMENTS INDUSTRY.
18. Towards a framework for critical citizenship education
19. Policy Formulation, Implementation and Feedback in EU Merger Control
20. Running head: CHILDREN'S ATTRIBUTIONS OF BELIEFS