Table 1. Main social-economic variables in Jaén olive tree farming in 1991. (Euros. Reference year
2000=100)
|
Marginal (7) |
Dry land (127) |
Irrigate |
land (15) | |||
|
_ |
Average |
Stand. Dev. |
Average |
Stand. Dev. |
Average |
Stand. Dev. |
|
Farming Area (Ha) |
18.79 |
17.67 |
25.56 |
25.48 |
76.35 |
94.51 |
|
Crop Yield (kg∕Ha) |
624.75 |
526.88 |
3,017.31 |
1,076.09 |
4,805.38 |
1,856.09 |
|
Labour work (working-days∕Ha) |
n. d. |
n. d. |
n. d. |
n. d. |
n. d. |
n. d. |
|
Total Expenditure (Euros∕Ha) |
72.41 |
22.38 |
217.18 |
131.72 |
188.67 |
114.65 |
|
Subsidies (Euros∕Ha) |
27.87 |
43.06 |
291.94 |
139.81 |
363.96 |
243.51 |
|
Total Revenue (Euros∕Ha) |
414.89 |
354.03 |
2,221.79 |
821.36 |
3,469.95 |
1,535.55 |
|
Direct Gross Margin (Euros∕Ha) |
329.81 |
367.76 |
2.012.30 |
768.57 |
3.296.83 |
1.540.49 |
Note: observations in every type of olive farm are in brackets.
Table 2. Main social-economic variables in Jaén olive tree farming in 1994. (Euros. Reference year
2000=100)
|
Marginal (24) |
Dry land (83) |
Irrigate land (41) | ||||
|
_ |
Average |
Stand. Dev. |
Average |
Stand. Dev. |
Average |
Stand. Dev. |
|
Farming Area (Ha) |
36.98 |
66.81 |
19.52 |
24.87 |
15.20 |
18.11 |
|
Crop Yield (kg∕Ha) |
785.62 |
306.70 |
2,591.99 |
1,086.07 |
3,908.92 |
1,165.77 |
|
Labour work (working-days∕Ha) |
9.47 |
5.21 |
16.52 |
8.08 |
20.98 |
10.45 |
|
Total Expenditure (Euros∕Ha) |
571.49 |
234.96 |
944.16 |
439.43 |
1,187.49 |
479.60 |
|
Subsidies (Euros∕Ha) |
227.77 |
160.46 |
606.88 |
345.01 |
851.23 |
459.58 |
|
Total Revenue (Euros∕Ha) |
757.73 |
352.38 |
2,361.41 |
1,114.87 |
3,357.07 |
1,134.36 |
|
Direct Gross Margin (Euros∕Ha) |
193.68 |
446.31 |
1,432.74 |
1,048.90 |
2,187.78 |
1,075.08 |
Note: observations in every type of olive farm are in brackets.
Table 3. Main social-economic variables in Jaén olive tree farming in 1999. (Euros. Reference year
2000=100)
|
Marginal (5) |
Dry land (47) |
Irrigate land (39) | ||||
|
_ |
Average |
Stand. Dev. |
Average |
Stand. Dev. |
Average |
Stand. Dev. |
|
Farming Area (Ha) |
67.30 |
48.82 |
13.18 |
13.03 |
45.46 |
53.97 |
|
Crop Yield (kg∕Ha) |
796.36 |
239.78 |
5,440.74 |
3,948.93 |
5,730.14 |
2,108.61 |
|
Labour work (working-days∕Ha) |
5.02 |
5.40 |
23.56 |
18.47 |
15.89 |
10.41 |
|
Total Expenditure (Euros∕Ha) |
687.23 |
294.52 |
1.301.04 |
869.23 |
954.13 |
613.10 |
|
Subsidies (Euros∕Ha) |
510.04 |
347.61 |
1.222.43 |
1.091.83 |
1.185.87 |
574.25 |
|
Total Revenue (Euros∕Ha) |
1,592.87 |
963.10 |
3,723.10 |
3,012.74 |
3,447.52 |
1,317.24 |
|
Direct Gross Margin (Euros∕Ha) |
856.93 |
776.08 |
2,436.89 |
2,643.85 |
2,474.36 |
1,280.41 |
Note: observations in every type of olive farm are in brackets.
11
More intriguing information
1. Lending to Agribusinesses in Zambia2. The name is absent
3. The name is absent
4. The purpose of this paper is to report on the 2008 inaugural Equal Opportunities Conference held at the University of East Anglia, Norwich
5. The name is absent
6. The constitution and evolution of the stars
7. Stillbirth in a Tertiary Care Referral Hospital in North Bengal - A Review of Causes, Risk Factors and Prevention Strategies
8. WP 1 - The first part-time economy in the world. Does it work?
9. Industrial districts, innovation and I-district effect: territory or industrial specialization?
10. The Role of Land Retirement Programs for Management of Water Resources