Table 1. Main social-economic variables in Jaén olive tree farming in 1991. (Euros. Reference year
2000=100)
|
Marginal (7) |
Dry land (127) |
Irrigate |
land (15) | |||
|
_ |
Average |
Stand. Dev. |
Average |
Stand. Dev. |
Average |
Stand. Dev. |
|
Farming Area (Ha) |
18.79 |
17.67 |
25.56 |
25.48 |
76.35 |
94.51 |
|
Crop Yield (kg∕Ha) |
624.75 |
526.88 |
3,017.31 |
1,076.09 |
4,805.38 |
1,856.09 |
|
Labour work (working-days∕Ha) |
n. d. |
n. d. |
n. d. |
n. d. |
n. d. |
n. d. |
|
Total Expenditure (Euros∕Ha) |
72.41 |
22.38 |
217.18 |
131.72 |
188.67 |
114.65 |
|
Subsidies (Euros∕Ha) |
27.87 |
43.06 |
291.94 |
139.81 |
363.96 |
243.51 |
|
Total Revenue (Euros∕Ha) |
414.89 |
354.03 |
2,221.79 |
821.36 |
3,469.95 |
1,535.55 |
|
Direct Gross Margin (Euros∕Ha) |
329.81 |
367.76 |
2.012.30 |
768.57 |
3.296.83 |
1.540.49 |
Note: observations in every type of olive farm are in brackets.
Table 2. Main social-economic variables in Jaén olive tree farming in 1994. (Euros. Reference year
2000=100)
|
Marginal (24) |
Dry land (83) |
Irrigate land (41) | ||||
|
_ |
Average |
Stand. Dev. |
Average |
Stand. Dev. |
Average |
Stand. Dev. |
|
Farming Area (Ha) |
36.98 |
66.81 |
19.52 |
24.87 |
15.20 |
18.11 |
|
Crop Yield (kg∕Ha) |
785.62 |
306.70 |
2,591.99 |
1,086.07 |
3,908.92 |
1,165.77 |
|
Labour work (working-days∕Ha) |
9.47 |
5.21 |
16.52 |
8.08 |
20.98 |
10.45 |
|
Total Expenditure (Euros∕Ha) |
571.49 |
234.96 |
944.16 |
439.43 |
1,187.49 |
479.60 |
|
Subsidies (Euros∕Ha) |
227.77 |
160.46 |
606.88 |
345.01 |
851.23 |
459.58 |
|
Total Revenue (Euros∕Ha) |
757.73 |
352.38 |
2,361.41 |
1,114.87 |
3,357.07 |
1,134.36 |
|
Direct Gross Margin (Euros∕Ha) |
193.68 |
446.31 |
1,432.74 |
1,048.90 |
2,187.78 |
1,075.08 |
Note: observations in every type of olive farm are in brackets.
Table 3. Main social-economic variables in Jaén olive tree farming in 1999. (Euros. Reference year
2000=100)
|
Marginal (5) |
Dry land (47) |
Irrigate land (39) | ||||
|
_ |
Average |
Stand. Dev. |
Average |
Stand. Dev. |
Average |
Stand. Dev. |
|
Farming Area (Ha) |
67.30 |
48.82 |
13.18 |
13.03 |
45.46 |
53.97 |
|
Crop Yield (kg∕Ha) |
796.36 |
239.78 |
5,440.74 |
3,948.93 |
5,730.14 |
2,108.61 |
|
Labour work (working-days∕Ha) |
5.02 |
5.40 |
23.56 |
18.47 |
15.89 |
10.41 |
|
Total Expenditure (Euros∕Ha) |
687.23 |
294.52 |
1.301.04 |
869.23 |
954.13 |
613.10 |
|
Subsidies (Euros∕Ha) |
510.04 |
347.61 |
1.222.43 |
1.091.83 |
1.185.87 |
574.25 |
|
Total Revenue (Euros∕Ha) |
1,592.87 |
963.10 |
3,723.10 |
3,012.74 |
3,447.52 |
1,317.24 |
|
Direct Gross Margin (Euros∕Ha) |
856.93 |
776.08 |
2,436.89 |
2,643.85 |
2,474.36 |
1,280.41 |
Note: observations in every type of olive farm are in brackets.
11
More intriguing information
1. Dendritic Inhibition Enhances Neural Coding Properties2. The name is absent
3. Conditions for learning: partnerships for engaging secondary pupils with contemporary art.
4. The name is absent
5. The name is absent
6. The name is absent
7. Job quality and labour market performance
8. The name is absent
9. The name is absent
10. Estimation of marginal abatement costs for undesirable outputs in India's power generation sector: An output distance function approach.