Olive Tree Farming in Jaen: Situation With the New Cap and Comparison With the Province Income Per Capita.



about disintegrated salaries. Comparison has been done taking information about dry land and
irrigated land6. Results are shown on tables 5 to 8.

Table 5. Analysis of main social-economic variables in Jaén olive tree dry land in 1994 comparing
the original survey with new data income per capita. (Euros. Reference year 2000=100)

Survey

One
IncomeZcapita

Doubled

IncomeZcapita

Tripled
IncomeZcapita

Quadrupled
IncomeZcapita

Cross-section Data

83

63

43

34

28

Farming Area (Ha)

19.52

24.68

33.49

38.13

43.3

Crop Yield (kg∕Ha)

2,591.99

2,756.49

2,570.69

2,606.14

2,557.28

Labour work (working-days∕Ha)

16.52

15.83

13.79

12.79

12.78

AWU1

1.09

1.35

1.77

1.94

2.19

Total Expenditure (Euros∕Ha)

944.16

856.92

761.06

725.12

712.95

Subsidies (Euros∕Ha)

606.88

626.89

596.07

624.2

596.86

Total Revenue (Euros∕Ha)

2,361.41

2,418.10

2,270.77

2,357.80

2,297.26

Direct Gross Margin (Euros∕Ha)

1,432.74

1,577.65

1,520.31

1,638.52

1,590.21

Average Income∕farm (Euros)

32,683.91

41,831.61

56,114.05

65,643.81

73,501.36

Source: Income per capita of Jaén province from Nacional Estatistic Institute (INE).

1Agrarian Work Unit: days of work per person dedicated to full-time during one year to the agrarian activity. It was
established in 1,826 hour∕year or 228 days∕year.

In the first column in table 5 we can observe average values got in each year sampling
and for each farm (this information is also shown in tables 2 and 3 for 1994 and 1999 crop
years).The following columns show values corresponding to the main socieconomic variables of
those farms giving an income equals or higher than once, twice, three times and four times
average per capita income in the province of Jaén during 1994 and 1999.

In all tables it is possible to observe a progressive reduction of the number of farms that
fulfill the criteria (which is logical in our opinion). However, when it is higher the income level
it is necessary to increase the average size of farm to be able to fulfill the criteria and at the
same time there is a better productivity per hectare in the farm. This generally comes with an
increase of labour work per hectare and above all in the total labour work employed in the farm
(AWU).

Respect to the economic variables, the subsidies∕Ha increase in the same way that per
capita income does (except for the dry land in 1994, Table 5, which was an extremely dry year

6 The marginal farms are not significant in 1994 and 1999 crop years. In 1994 shown an income lower than Jaen
province average per capita income, while in 1999 only four farms was significant.

14



More intriguing information

1. From Aurora Borealis to Carpathians. Searching the Road to Regional and Rural Development
2. Discourse Patterns in First Language Use at Hcme and Second Language Learning at School: an Ethnographic Approach
3. AN ANALYTICAL METHOD TO CALCULATE THE ERGODIC AND DIFFERENCE MATRICES OF THE DISCOUNTED MARKOV DECISION PROCESSES
4. Optimal Private and Public Harvesting under Spatial and Temporal Interdependence
5. Who’s afraid of critical race theory in education? a reply to Mike Cole’s ‘The color-line and the class struggle’
6. The name is absent
7. The name is absent
8. STIMULATING COOPERATION AMONG FARMERS IN A POST-SOCIALIST ECONOMY: LESSONS FROM A PUBLIC-PRIVATE MARKETING PARTNERSHIP IN POLAND
9. The Complexity Era in Economics
10. SOCIOECONOMIC TRENDS CHANGING RURAL AMERICA
11. The magnitude and Cyclical Behavior of Financial Market Frictions
12. The Folklore of Sorting Algorithms
13. A Duality Approach to Testing the Economic Behaviour of Dairy-Marketing Co-operatives: The Case of Ireland
14. Human Resource Management Practices and Wage Dispersion in U.S. Establishments
15. Growth and Technological Leadership in US Industries: A Spatial Econometric Analysis at the State Level, 1963-1997
16. SME'S SUPPORT AND REGIONAL POLICY IN EU - THE NORTE-LITORAL PORTUGUESE EXPERIENCE
17. The name is absent
18. The name is absent
19. Constrained School Choice
20. The name is absent