dependent variable is the logarithm of the number of manufacturing establishments, and the
independent variable is the logarithm of the public infrastructure capital stock. The latter is again
introduced as three forms (total, productive, and social) in each of the four spatial levels of reference.
Again, the regressions have included a constant term, a time trend, and a set of (N-1) dummy
variables capturing the regional or sectoral specific effects (not reported on here due to space
limitations). Thus, the working equation becomes:
nu = Git +1 + uit (42)
(notation as in previous equations)
The results of tables 12 to 15 show that there is no direct impact of public capital on the
number of establishments, as the public capital coefficients are statistically insignificant in all these
regressions. This is true for all spatial levels. However, as Holtz-Eakin and Lovely have argued, there
is the danger that such a regression “fails to control for the resources available to the manufacturing
sector” (1996, p. 120).
Table 12 Infrastructure effects on the equilibrium number of firms (regression based infrastructure and
time): Regional panel for total manufacturing, 1982-1991
Dependent Variable: ln of Number of Manufacturing Establishments |
lnG(social) |
time -0.004 |
Adjust. |
SSE 21.276 |
SE 0.220 | ||
Constant -0.978 (-0.574) |
lnG(total) 0.104 (1.208) |
lnG(prod) | |||||
0.448 |
0.032 |
0.004 |
0.976 |
21.337 |
0.221 | ||
(0.315) |
(0.445) |
(0.374) | |||||
-2.836 |
0.218 |
-0.003 |
0.977 |
20.869 |
0.218 | ||
(-2.291)** |
(3.168)*** |
(-0.582) |
*** Statistically significant at 1% level, ** Statistically significant at 5% level, * Statistically significant at 10% level
Table 13 Infrastructure effects on the equilibrium number of firms (regression based infrastructure and
time): Greece panel for sectors, 1982-1991
Dependent Variable: ln of Number of Manufacturing Establishments |
lnG(social) |
time -0.004 |
Adjust. |
SSE 1.205 |
SE 0.082 | ||
Constant 7.432 |
lnG(total) -0.130 (-0.939) |
lnG(prod) | |||||
7.139 (2.255)** |
-0.120 (-0.937) |
-0.005 (-0.347) |
0.990 |
1.205 |
0.082 | ||
8.053 (1.928)* |
-0.164 (-0.929) |
-0.005 (-0.412) |
0.990 |
1.205 |
0.082 |
*** Statistically significant at 1% level, ** Statistically significant at 5% level, * Statistically significant at 10% level
Table 14 Infrastructure effects on the equilibrium number of firms (regression based infrastructure and Dependent Variable: ln of Number of Manufacturing Establishments Constant lnG(total) lnG(prod) lnG(social) time Adjust. SSE SE trend R2 8.784 -0.212 -0.029 0.979 3.027 0.134 (1.584) (-0.897) (-1.619) | |||||
9.525 |
-0.248 |
-0.025 |
0.979 |
3.018 |
0.134 |
25
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. The name is absent
3. Making International Human Rights Protection More Effective: A Rational-Choice Approach to the Effectiveness of Ius Standi Provisions
4. The name is absent
5. Public infrastructure capital, scale economies and returns to variety
6. Ronald Patterson, Violinist; Brooks Smith, Pianist
7. Shifting Identities and Blurring Boundaries: The Emergence of Third Space Professionals in UK Higher Education
8. The Making of Cultural Policy: A European Perspective
9. The name is absent
10. School Effectiveness in Developing Countries - A Summary of the Research Evidence