Telecommuting and environmental policy - lessons from the Ecommute program



Walls, Nelson, Safirova


Telecommuting and Environmental Policy

those employees who chose to sign up, and they are likely to be people who want to, and are able to,
telecommute relatively often - just under 2 days per week, on average. We have no information on the
general, non-telecommuting, workforce. Another problem that may come into play, and one that we
mentioned above, is that people may be reporting more faithfully during the weeks in which they have
some telecommuting and not reporting in other weeks. This could bias the mode choice percentages
and in particular, raise the percentage of workdays that are telecommuting days above what it actually
is.

Table 5. Mode Choice of Employees in the ecommute Program on All Workdays, By City

As of March 1, 2004

Percentage of Total Workdays Reported That are Days
on Which Employees

Drove

Drove or Rode in

Used

Walked

or Teleworked3

Alone1

a Car/Vanpool

Public

Other2

Transit

Washington, DC

55.4

3.3

1.9

3.7

35.7

Denver

46.8

7.9

3.1

3.9

38.3

Houston

62.9

9.2

2.4

7.2

18.3

Los Angeles

39.3

2.2

17.4

6.0

35.0

Philadelphia

39.5

1.3

7.3

2.0

50.0

ALL CITIES

49.0

6.6

3.8

4.2

36.4

1The drove-alone option includes motorcycles.

2The other category includes a self-reported “other” option as well as walking, bicycling, and roller-blading.

3Telework includes working at home and working at a telework center. Very few employees reported using a
telework center.

The figures vary in some rather surprising ways across the cities. Los Angeles, the land of the
automobile, has the lowest percentage of days in which employees drove to work alone and by far the
highest percentage using public transit - over 17% of the time, employees in L.A. reportedly use transit.
By contrast, in Philadelphia, transit is used only 7.3% of the time. Houston has the lowest reported
telework days in the system at 18.3%. That city also has the highest “drove alone” percentage and the
highest reported carpool and vanpool use.

It is also interesting to look at these same percentages for non-telework days. In other words,
on the days that the employee worked but did
not telecommute, what does he report as his commute
mode? Table 8 shows the findings in the data. If all employees who telecommute would otherwise have
driven alone to work - a typical assumption made in many studies when looking at the congestion and
emission benefits from telecommuting - we would expect that the percentages in the first column of
Table 6 would be roughly equal to the sum of the first and last columns of Table 5. In other words, the
percentages attributable to teleworking in Table 5 would now be included in the “drove alone” option.
This is not the case, however. Instead, the percentages for all modes rise. We will return to this point
when we discuss the emissions reductions from the ecommute program in Section 5.3 below. Across all
five cities, driving alone takes place on 77% of reported workdays when employees do not
telecommute; transit accounts for 6% of all non-telecommuting workdays, and car and vanpools
approximately 10%.

15



More intriguing information

1. Disturbing the fiscal theory of the price level: Can it fit the eu-15?
2. AMINO ACIDS SEQUENCE ANALYSIS ON COLLAGEN
3. A Dynamic Model of Conflict and Cooperation
4. National curriculum assessment: how to make it better
5. Palvelujen vienti ja kansainvälistyminen
6. Estimated Open Economy New Keynesian Phillips Curves for the G7
7. The name is absent
8. Citizenship
9. The economic doctrines in the wine trade and wine production sectors: the case of Bastiat and the Port wine sector: 1850-1908
10. The name is absent