Business Networks and Performance: A Spatial Approach



second round of input to the local economy triggers the regional multiplier assumed to
be:

k = ----г---------1-------й------

(1)


kr 1 -[(с - m ) + (i-g )](1 -t )

where c is the marginal propensity to consume, m is the marginal propensity to
consume imported products,
i is the marginal propensity to invest in the local economy,
g is the marginal propensity of reducing government spending as local income
increases and
t is the tax rate. Taking into account the multiplier in equation (1) and the
third and subsequent rounds of impacts of a new enterprise, the impacts of all

aforementioned rounds on regional income will be:

Yr = ∆Xr +


Xr (cF∙ mF )(1 tF )

1 - [(c - m ) + (i + g)](1 - t )


(2)


An examination of equation (2) shows the numerical importance of Xr , i.e, the
additional regional income due to the firm’s exporting activities and of
cF - mF , i.e., the
firm’s marginal propensity to consume locally produced products.

We may assume that firms accessing various types of networks as these were defined
above may show higher levels of exports and/or higher levels of a marginal propensity
to use locally produced inputs. Firms accessing vertical (in spatial terms) networks of
customers may show higher levels of exports or indeed export a higher percentage of its
production. On the other hand, firms accessing horizontal (in spatial terms) networks of
suppliers may show a higher propensity to use locally produced inputs. Horizontal
networks of suppliers may provide an advantage to their members in terms either of a
steady flow of inputs and/or of lower and pre-determined prices. Furthermore, the type
of network agreements (formal vs informal) and other types of networks such as
financial networks may also play an important role in facilitating or inhibiting increased
regional exports and increased use of locally produced materials.

Figure 1 presents the graphical representation of this hypothesis by adapting a
previously formulated hypothesis of Kneafsey et al (2001). In this hypothesis we
assume the operation of two spatial types of networks in the economy and society of the
case study regions:



More intriguing information

1. The name is absent
2. The Role of State Trading Enterprises and Their Impact on Agricultural Development and Economic Growth in Developing Countries
3. The name is absent
4. Who’s afraid of critical race theory in education? a reply to Mike Cole’s ‘The color-line and the class struggle’
5. Structural Conservation Practices in U.S. Corn Production: Evidence on Environmental Stewardship by Program Participants and Non-Participants
6. The name is absent
7. The name is absent
8. Psychological Aspects of Market Crashes
9. Does Competition Increase Economic Efficiency in Swedish County Councils?
10. Novelty and Reinforcement Learning in the Value System of Developmental Robots
11. Locke's theory of perception
12. Campanile Orchestra
13. The name is absent
14. Gender stereotyping and wage discrimination among Italian graduates
15. Contribution of Economics to Design of Sustainable Cattle Breeding Programs in Eastern Africa: A Choice Experiment Approach
16. The Institutional Determinants of Bilateral Trade Patterns
17. The name is absent
18. Errors in recorded security prices and the turn-of-the year effect
19. The Role of area-yield crop insurance program face to the Mid-term Review of Common Agricultural Policy
20. A Theoretical Growth Model for Ireland