MSE |
_________QLIKE____ | ||
ARMA |
1.659 |
ARFIMA |
3159.2 |
ARFIMA |
1.667 |
ARMA |
3174.3 |
GARCHRV |
1.952 |
SVRV |
3222.5 |
GJRRV |
2.161 |
VIX |
3253.0 |
GJRRVG |
2.404 |
GARCHRV |
3266.6 |
VIX |
2.525 |
GJRRV |
3278.7 |
GARCH |
2.575 |
GARCH |
3472.5 |
SV |
2.730 |
GJR |
3575.7 |
GJR |
2.857 |
GJRRVG |
3700.7 |
SVRV |
4.543 |
SV_______ |
3923.0 |
Table 1: Loss function rankings for individual forecasts.
Model |
Tr |
MCS |
TSQ |
MCS |
P |
Pl |
P |
Pl | |
SVRV |
0.013 |
0.013 |
0.005 |
0.005 |
GJR |
0.016 |
0.016 |
0.005 |
0.005 |
SV |
0.016 |
0.016 |
0.002 |
0.005 |
GARCH |
0.011 |
0.016 |
0.003 |
0.005 |
VIX |
0.011 |
0.016 |
0.004 |
0.005 |
GJRRVG |
0.009 |
0.016 |
0.000 |
0.005 |
GJRRV |
0.005 |
0.016 |
0.000 |
0.005 |
GARCHRV |
0.008 |
0.016 |
0.006 |
0.006 |
ARFIMA |
0.844 |
0.844 |
0.844 |
0.844 |
ARMA |
_ |
1.000 |
_ |
1.000 |
Table 2: MCS results for individual forecasts given the MSE loss function.
The first row respresents the first model removed, down to the best performing
model in the last row.
that incorporate RV measures into the volatility equation are more accurate
out-of-sample than those that do not.
MCS results will now reveal whether the VIX is significantly inferior to
those forecasts with lower average loss.
Table 2 reports the MCS results for the individual forecasts based on the
MSE loss function. It turns out that the model with the largest T⅛ test statistic
is the SVRV model. The p-value, determined in the first reduction round is
0.013. As it is eliminated in the first round this automatically determines the
17
More intriguing information
1. Infrastructure Investment in Network Industries: The Role of Incentive Regulation and Regulatory Independence2. The Determinants of Individual Trade Policy Preferences: International Survey Evidence
3. Language discrimination by human newborns and by cotton-top tamarin monkeys
4. ENERGY-RELATED INPUT DEMAND BY CROP PRODUCERS
5. FOREIGN AGRICULTURAL SERVICE PROGRAMS AND FOREIGN RELATIONS
6. The name is absent
7. The effect of classroom diversity on tolerance and participation in England, Sweden and Germany
8. A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON UNDERINVESTMENT IN AGRICULTURAL R&D
9. Subduing High Inflation in Romania. How to Better Monetary and Exchange Rate Mechanisms?
10. AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION OF THE PRODUCTION EFFECTS OF ADOPTING GM SEED TECHNOLOGY: THE CASE OF FARMERS IN ARGENTINA