The name is absent



To understand how this three-step procedure works, consider the following general linear-
quadratic control problem. Let the economic environment be one in which an
n × 1 vector of
endogenous variables,
zt, consisting of nι predetermined variables, xt, and n (n = n — nι)
nonpredetermined variables,
yt, evolves over time according to

xt+ι = Axxxt + Axy yt + Bxuut + εt+ι,                   (12)

Etyt+ι = AXt + Ayy yt + Byu ut,                          (13)

where ut is a p × 1 vector of policy control variables, εt ~ i.i.d. [0, ] is an s × 1 (snɪ) vector
of white-noise innovations, and E
t is the private sector’s mathematical expectations operator
conditional upon period
t information. The matrices Axx, Axy, Ayx, Ayy, Bxu, and Byu
contain the structural parameters that govern preferences and technology and are conformable
with
xt, yt, and ut as necessary. The matrix Ayy is assumed to have full rank.

Subject to equations (12) and (13) and Xo known, the control problem is for the policymaker
to choose the sequence of control variables
{ut}to minimize

Eo βt [ztwzt + 2ztUut + u^Rut] ,                     (14)

t=o

where zt ≡ [ xt yt ] . Methods to solve this optimal commitment problem are by now well
known (see Oudiz and Sachs (1985) and Backus and Driffill (1986)). For the purposes of this
section, however, what is important is that the equilibrium has the form

xt

= Mxx xt + Mxppt + t+l,

(15)

Pt

= Mpxxt + MppPt,

(16)

yt

= Hx xt + HpPt,

(17)

ut

= Fxxt + FpPt,

(18)

where pt is the n^ × 1 vector of shadow prices associated with the nonpredetermined variables
and the system is initialized with
xo known and po = 0. These shadow prices are the direct
analog to the Lagrange multipliers employed earlier, and they serve as state variables, keeping
track of the current value of past promises, in the equilibrium (Kydland and Prescott, 1980).

With the solution to the optimal commitment problem in hand, the second step is to

use these equilibrium relationships to derive an expression for the shadow prices. Define

dt


yt
ut


and rewrite equations (17) and (18) as


dt = Gxxt + ɑp Pt,

(19)




More intriguing information

1. Perceived Market Risks and Strategic Risk Management of Food Manufactures: Empirical Results from the German Brewing Industry
2. Modelling the Effects of Public Support to Small Firms in the UK - Paradise Gained?
3. The migration of unskilled youth: Is there any wage gain?
4. The name is absent
5. GROWTH, UNEMPLOYMENT AND THE WAGE SETTING PROCESS.
6. European Integration: Some stylised facts
7. Permanent and Transitory Policy Shocks in an Empirical Macro Model with Asymmetric Information
8. The urban sprawl dynamics: does a neural network understand the spatial logic better than a cellular automata?
9. The name is absent
10. The name is absent
11. The name is absent
12. Sector Switching: An Unexplored Dimension of Firm Dynamics in Developing Countries
13. Optimal Tax Policy when Firms are Internationally Mobile
14. The name is absent
15. Peer Reviewed, Open Access, Free
16. The name is absent
17. TINKERING WITH VALUATION ESTIMATES: IS THERE A FUTURE FOR WILLINGNESS TO ACCEPT MEASURES?
18. The name is absent
19. The Shepherd Sinfonia
20. Automatic Dream Sentiment Analysis