The name is absent



prices obtained from equation (20) fully satisfy the model’s equilibrium relationships. It
follows that a valid solution for
pt can be obtained from any subset of the variables in yt and
uprovided that the resulting Gp matrix has rank(Gp) n2. Although the particular state
variables that enter the timeless perspective equilibrium will depend on which equilibrium
relationships are used when solving for
pt, by construction, they all imply the same welfare
and equilibrium behavior. That timeless perspective equilibria have multiple representations
is also reflected in the fact that although the procedure described above yields an equilibrium
in which
ut is a function of xt, xt-i, yt-i, and ut-i, the approach described in Section 2
would yield an equilibrium in which
ut is a function of xt, yt-ι, ut-i, and ut-2.7

One situation where the rank condition, rank(Gp) n2, will often fail is when equation
(18) is used in isolation to solve for the shadow prices, as per Tetlow and von zur Muehlen
(2001). They solve for
pt according to

pt = Fp1 (ut - Fxxt),                                 (22)

where F-1 denotes the generalized (left) inverse of Fp, and use this expression to eliminate the
shadow prices from the system. The problem with using equation (22) is that, unless
p n2,
the solution for
pt will be generated from a system that is underdetermined. Consequently,
the shadow prices will no longer necessarily obey the model’s equilibrium relationships. In
the Tetlow and von zur Muehlen (2001) application there was one nonpredetermined variable
and one control variable, so p
= n2 and no problem arose. But if p <n2, as is invariably the
case, then employing equation (22) will lead to erroneous results.

Two further points are worth emphasizing before leaving this section. First, provided
dt = ut, and therefore that Gp = Fp, a representation for the timeless perspective targeting
rule can be recovered by substituting equation (20) back into equation (18). This substitution
leads to the expression

ut = (Fχ - FpGp1Gx) xt + FpGp1dt,                      (23)

which describes a relationship that ut, xt, and yt must satisfy along the equilibrium path.
Second, the timeless perspective equilibrium described by equation (21) essentially has two
components. The first component is a transition equation for the predetermined variables,

xt+i = Nχχi xt + Nχχ2xt-1 + Nχddt-ι + εt∙                  (24)

7Importantly, this well-known multiplicity of representations makes no material difference for the analysis
or conclusions that follow, since I assume—for consistency—that the conditioning variables satisfy the timeless
perspective equilibrium relationships.



More intriguing information

1. The East Asian banking sector—overweight?
2. IMPROVING THE UNIVERSITY'S PERFORMANCE IN PUBLIC POLICY EDUCATION
3. The Dynamic Cost of the Draft
4. Multifunctionality of Agriculture: An Inquiry Into the Complementarity Between Landscape Preservation and Food Security
5. Globalization and the benefits of trade
6. Disturbing the fiscal theory of the price level: Can it fit the eu-15?
7. The name is absent
8. Placenta ingestion by rats enhances y- and n-opioid antinociception, but suppresses A-opioid antinociception
9. Der Einfluß der Direktdemokratie auf die Sozialpolitik
10. LABOR POLICY AND THE OVER-ALL ECONOMY