|
Table 1: Probability Forecasts of a crisis event (1.5 std) | |||||
|
Indo |
Mal |
Phil |
Kor |
Thai | |
|
ARDL,pc |
0.44;0.44 |
0.89;0.54 |
-0.05;-0.05 |
0.44;0.44 |
0.44;0.44 |
|
Probit _pc |
0.05;NA |
0.10;0.07 |
0.00;NA |
0.11;0.11 |
0.11;0.11 |
Note: The numbers corresponding the row labelled ARDL_pc are indicators of probability forecast
performance (of a crisis event defined as 1.5 standard deviation above the mean) when using the ARDL
model, with the principal components as exogenous regressors. The numbers corresponding the row labelled
Probit_pc are indicators of probability forecast performance when using the Probit model (estimated by ML),
with the principal components as exogenous regressors. In each cell, the number preceding the semicolon
is the KS score, whereas the number right after the semicolon in each cell is the Matthews correlation
coefficient. NA stands for Not Available and it is due to values both equal to zero for the numerator and
the denominator of theMatthews correlation coefficient.
Table 2: Probability Forecasts of a crisis event (2 std)
|
Indo |
Mal |
Phil |
Kor |
Thai | |
|
ARDL,pc |
0.50;0.68 |
0.89;0.54 |
-0.05;-0.05 |
0.94;0.68 |
0.94;0.68 |
|
Probit _pc |
0.11;0.11 |
0.10;0.07 |
0.10;0.07 |
0.10;0.07 |
0.10;0.07 |
Note: See Note to Table 1. The crisis event is defined as two standard deviation above the mean
|
Table 3: The role of total debt | |||||
|
Indo |
Mal |
Phil |
Kor |
Thai | |
|
crisis(1.5 std) |
0.44;0.44 |
0.94;0.68 |
-0.05;-0.05 |
0.44;0.44 |
0.44;0.44 |
|
crisis(2 std) |
0.50;0.68 |
0.94;0.68 |
-0.05;-0.05 |
0.94;0.68 |
0.94;0.68 |
Note: In this Table we report indicators of probability forecast performance (the KS score and the
Matthews correlation coefficient on the l.h.s. and r.h.s of each cell, respectively) associated with the ARDL
model which uses the principal components as exogenous regressors. The principal components have been
extracted from a dataset without the ratio of total external debt to the stock of international reserves in
each country.
|
Table 4: The role of short term debt | |||||
|
Indo |
Mal |
Phil |
Kor |
Thai | |
|
crisis(1.5 std) |
0.44;0.44 |
-0.10;-0.07 |
-0.05;-0.05 |
-0.05;-0.07 |
0.44;0.44 |
|
crisis(2 std) |
0.44;0.44 |
-0.05;-0.05 |
-0.05;-0.05 |
-0.05;-0.05 |
-0.05;-0.05 |
Note: see Note to Table 3. The principal components have been extracted from a dataset without the
ratio of short term external debt to the stock of international reserves in each country
|
Table 5: The role of long term debt | |||||
|
Indo |
Mal |
Phil |
Kor |
Thai | |
|
crisis(1.5 std) |
0.44;0.44 |
0.94;0.68 |
-0.05;-0.05 |
0.44;0.44 |
0.44;0.44 |
|
crisis(2 std) |
0.50;0.68 |
-0.05;-0.05 |
-0.05;-0.05 |
-0.05;-0.05 |
0.94;0.68 |
Note: see Note to Table 3. The principal components have been extracted from a dataset without the
ratio of long term external debt to the stock of international reserves in each country
20
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. Innovation Policy and the Economy, Volume 11
3. EU Preferential Partners in Search of New Policy Strategies for Agriculture: The Case of Citrus Sector in Trinidad and Tobago
4. Problems of operationalizing the concept of a cost-of-living index
5. DISCUSSION: POLICY CONSIDERATIONS OF EMERGING INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES
6. Optimal Private and Public Harvesting under Spatial and Temporal Interdependence
7. The name is absent
8. Testing the Information Matrix Equality with Robust Estimators
9. The name is absent
10. Database Search Strategies for Proteomic Data Sets Generated by Electron Capture Dissociation Mass Spectrometry