Litteratur
[1] Backhouse, Roger E. (1998): “If Mathematics Is Informal, Then Perhaps
We Should Accept That Economics Must Be Informal Too”, The Eco-
nomic Journal 1998, pp. 1848-58.
[2] Chick, Victoria (1998): “On Knowing One’s Place: the Role of Formalism
in Economics”, The Economic Journal 1998, pp. 1859-69.
[3] Chick, Victoria & Dow, Sheila C. (2001): “Formalism, logic and reality: a
Keynesian analysis”, Cambridge Journal of Economics 2001, pp. 705-21.
[4] Coase, R.H. (1975): ”Marshall on Method” her fra bogen “Essays on Eco-
nomics and Economists”, The University of Chicago Press 1991, pp. 167-
75.
[5] Dow, Sheila C. (1998): “Controversy: Formalism in Economics, Editorial
Note”, The Economic Journal 1998, pp. 1826-28.
[6] Krugman, Paul (1998): “Two Cheers for Formalism”, The Economic Jour-
nal 1998, pp. 1829-36.
[7] Lawson, Tony (1997): “Situated rationality”, Journal of Economic Meth-
odology 4:1 1997, pp. 101-25.
[8] Leijonhufvud, Axel (1997): “Models and theories”, Journal of Economic
Methodology 4:2 1997, pp. 193-98.
[9] Morishima, Michio (1991): “General Equilibrium Theory in the Twenty-
First Century”, The Economic Journal 1991, pp. 69-74.
[10] Olesen, Finn (1991): “Keynes’ kritik af Tinbergens Metode” fra bogen
’’Model og Virkelighed - træk af debatten om de 0konomiske modeller”,
16