Table 1: Rating of the degree of integration
Rating |
Comments | ||
Microeconomic convergence: a Markets for goods and services | |||
Tradeables |
+++ |
intense intra-EU trade, nearly Full equalisation of prices | |
Partly tradeables |
+ |
Increasing trade flows, some | |
b |
Non-tradeables Markets for factors of production |
0 |
By definition no trade flows, no |
Labour market |
0 |
No mobility and hence, no | |
Market for real capital Macroeconomic convergence: |
++ |
Some mobility manifested through FDI flows, mergers | |
Price level |
++ |
Labour intensive non-tradeables cheaper in poor | |
Inflation rates |
+++ |
intense intra-EU trade and stable exchange rates | |
d |
Nominal interest rates Real convergence |
+++ |
massive cross-border financial activities in the framework |
Business cycle synchronisation |
+ |
Member state specific business cycles because of different | |
Unemployment |
0 |
No equalisation of employment because of country | |
Living standards |
+ |
Mixed trends of convergence of living standards because |
Note: Rating of integration according to outcome, i.e. degree of equalisation between Member States.
Ratings from 0 (no integration) to full integration +++++.
Source: Own adaption.
Markets for goods and services
The formation of the customs union and the Single Market has as expected
increased the intra-EU trade as shown in Figure 1. Also the trade between the
12
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. Migration and employment status during the turbulent nineties in Sweden
3. The name is absent
4. Experience, Innovation and Productivity - Empirical Evidence from Italy's Slowdown
5. On Dictatorship, Economic Development and Stability
6. Review of “From Political Economy to Economics: Method, the Social and Historical Evolution of Economic Theory”
7. The name is absent
8. Dynamic Explanations of Industry Structure and Performance
9. The name is absent
10. Do Decision Makers' Debt-risk Attitudes Affect the Agency Costs of Debt?