Table 1: Rating of the degree of integration
Rating |
Comments | ||
Microeconomic convergence: a Markets for goods and services | |||
Tradeables |
+++ |
intense intra-EU trade, nearly Full equalisation of prices | |
Partly tradeables |
+ |
Increasing trade flows, some | |
b |
Non-tradeables Markets for factors of production |
0 |
By definition no trade flows, no |
Labour market |
0 |
No mobility and hence, no | |
Market for real capital Macroeconomic convergence: |
++ |
Some mobility manifested through FDI flows, mergers | |
Price level |
++ |
Labour intensive non-tradeables cheaper in poor | |
Inflation rates |
+++ |
intense intra-EU trade and stable exchange rates | |
d |
Nominal interest rates Real convergence |
+++ |
massive cross-border financial activities in the framework |
Business cycle synchronisation |
+ |
Member state specific business cycles because of different | |
Unemployment |
0 |
No equalisation of employment because of country | |
Living standards |
+ |
Mixed trends of convergence of living standards because |
Note: Rating of integration according to outcome, i.e. degree of equalisation between Member States.
Ratings from 0 (no integration) to full integration +++++.
Source: Own adaption.
Markets for goods and services
The formation of the customs union and the Single Market has as expected
increased the intra-EU trade as shown in Figure 1. Also the trade between the
12