Non-causality in Bivariate Binary Panel Data



that Ti is a Markov time with respect to the filtration i-ι∙ The likelihood of
the sample can be written in compact form as:

N T

ь(^) = ППРг{^Ы} =

i=l t=l


√¾λh,∙m⅛J' *»1»
1
ÿi,i              /   ∙ yt,τ               ɪ            yt,t

where p⅛ι⅛ is given by (8), and is therefore a function of sʤi-i and the parameters
7∙

Under some conditions, developed in the following, maximization of the log-
likelihood leads to consistent, asymptotically normal and asymptotically effi-
cient estimates of the parameters of the model, which ensures that LR tests are
asymptotically
χ2 distributed under the null hypothesis.9 Let us discuss the
asymptotics involved, by considering three cases:

• T —> ∞, N finite

• T finite, N —> ∞

• T —> ∞, T —> ∞

To keep the notation simple, notice that the Markov model for homogeneous
population can be written in a compact notation, since it is equivalent to a
Markov model for the process
{St} which, at any time t, takes on values in
a finite state-space 5 = {0,1,2,3},1° with a stationary (or
time-homogeneous')
transition probability matrix P = ∣∣F⅛j⅛11, (h,k) & S×S; clearly F is a stochastic
matrix, that is, F⅛⅛ ≥ 0
Vh, k, and ɪ) ?hk = ɪ- Moreover we define

fees

F" = F-^=∣∣F^∣∣
n times

where Pf{k = Pr {St+n = kSt = h}.

Essentially, what we need to have the usual asymptotic properties for the
ML estimates and LR tests is that
all the transitions whose probabilities have
to be estimated
(i.e. are not known) can be observed infinitely many times
as
T and/or N go to infinity. It is intuitive that this ensures consistent and
asymptotically normal estimates of the transition probabilities. This requires
the following:

9McFadden (1984) proves consistency and asymptotic normality for a general multinomial
model under more general conditions, but the extension in this case seems to be difficult,
because he postulates that the explanatory variables are independent identically distributed for
each observation. This does not seem to hold generally for multiperiod models; nevertheless,
McFadden’s result can be applied to our homogeneous model.

10The elements of S correspond element-wise with the elements of У, so defined:

У = {(0,0), (0,1) , (1,0) , (1,1)} .
representing the state space of the process {Yi} at any time t.

12



More intriguing information

1. The quick and the dead: when reaction beats intention
2. Cyber-pharmacies and emerging concerns on marketing drugs Online
3. The name is absent
4. Does Competition Increase Economic Efficiency in Swedish County Councils?
5. Better policy analysis with better data. Constructing a Social Accounting Matrix from the European System of National Accounts.
6. REVITALIZING FAMILY FARM AGRICULTURE
7. The name is absent
8. Une Classe de Concepts
9. The name is absent
10. The name is absent
11. The name is absent
12. What Lessons for Economic Development Can We Draw from the Champagne Fairs?
13. ¿Por qué se privatizan servicios en los municipios (pequeños)? Evidencia empírica sobre residuos sólidos y agua.
14. The name is absent
15. Public Debt Management in Brazil
16. The name is absent
17. Conflict and Uncertainty: A Dynamic Approach
18. Strategic Policy Options to Improve Irrigation Water Allocation Efficiency: Analysis on Egypt and Morocco
19. THE ECONOMICS OF COMPETITION IN HEALTH INSURANCE- THE IRISH CASE STUDY.
20. The Institutional Determinants of Bilateral Trade Patterns