Carlo experiments.
The between period (BP) estimates on levels for the original and the reverse
regression give virtually the same input elasticity for materials. For capital, we find
substantial deviations between the two sets of BP estimators, which may indicate
that measurement errors or disturbances have period specific, or strongly serially
correlated, components.
Finally, we find that GMM estimates based on the equation in levels are more
precise than those based on the equation in differences. Deducting period means
from levels to compensate for non-stationarity of the latent regressor, give estimates
for the level equation which are less precise and more sensitive to the choice of in-
strument set than those operating on untransformed levels. On the other hand, this
kind of transformations of level variables may be needed to compensate for period
effects, mis-specified dynamics, or non-stationarity of the variables, in particular
for the capital input variable. It should come as no surprise that the adjustment
of material input is far easier to model within the framework considered than is
capital.
27
More intriguing information
1. Distortions in a multi-level co-financing system: the case of the agri-environmental programme of Saxony-Anhalt2. he Effect of Phosphorylation on the Electron Capture Dissociation of Peptide Ions
3. Needing to be ‘in the know’: strategies of subordination used by 10-11 year old school boys
4. Correlation Analysis of Financial Contagion: What One Should Know Before Running a Test
5. Gender and headship in the twenty-first century
6. The name is absent
7. Enterpreneurship and problems of specialists training in Ukraine
8. Transport system as an element of sustainable economic growth in the tourist region
9. Estimating the Impact of Medication on Diabetics' Diet and Lifestyle Choices
10. Design and investigation of scalable multicast recursive protocols for wired and wireless ad hoc networks