Post hoc analyses of children’s responses from the Inference condition revealed that the 6
year-olds performed significantly better than the 4 year-olds [immediate: Mann-Whitney:
Z=2.8, p<.005); delayed post test (Mann-Whitney: Z= 4.2, p<.05)] and the 5 year-olds
[immediate: Mann-Whitney: Z=2.02, p<.05); delayed post test (Mann-Whitney: Z= 2.7,
p<.005)]. Furthermore, the 5 year-olds performed significantly better than the 4 year-olds
during the delayed post test (Mann-Whitney: Z= 2.6, p<.05).
Post hoc analyses of children’s responses from the Definition condition indicated that the 6-
year olds performed significantly better than the 4 year-olds [immediate: Mann-Whitney:
Z=4.5, p<.0000); delayed post test (Mann-Whitney: Z= 3.2, p<.005)] and the 5 year-olds
during the immediate post test: (Mann-Whitney: Z=3.2, p<.005). Furthermore, the 5 year-olds
performed significantly better than the 4 year-olds [immediate: Mann-Whitney: Z=2.4,
p<.05); delayed post test (Mann-Whitney: Z= 2.6, p<.05)].
Post hoc analyses of children’s responses from the Analogy condition demonstrated that the
6 year-olds performed significantly better than the 4 year-olds (immediate: Mann-Whitney:
Z=2.8, p<.005; delayed: Mann-Whitney: Z=2.8, p<.005).The 5 year-olds performed
significantly better than the 4 year-olds during the delayed post test (Mann-Whitney: Z=
2.01, p<.05). No significant differences were found between the 6- and the 5 year-olds.
Post hoc analyses of children’s responses from the Lexical contrast condition indicated that
the 6 year-olds performed significantly better than the 4 year olds (Mann-Whitney: Z= 3.1,
p<.005) and the 5 year-olds (Mann-Whitney: Z= 2.3, p<.05) during the immediate post test.
No significant differences were found between the 4- and the 5 year-olds.
To what extent does children’s performance on the definition task differ by linguistic
condition?
If all children from each linguistic condition were correct on the two target words, the
maximum total score would be 96 for each linguistic condition in each post test. Figure 5.12
below shows children’s performance on the definition task by linguistic condition for both
post tests. The statistical analysis of the immediate post test revealed that there was a trend
for the children in the Inference and Definition conditions to perform better on the definition
task than the children in the Lexical contrast condition. Furthermore, the children in the
138
More intriguing information
1. LABOR POLICY AND THE OVER-ALL ECONOMY2. Three Policies to Improve Productivity Growth in Canada
3. Are Japanese bureaucrats politically stronger than farmers?: The political economy of Japan's rice set-aside program
4. DISCUSSION: ASSESSING STRUCTURAL CHANGE IN THE DEMAND FOR FOOD COMMODITIES
5. The name is absent
6. Analyzing the Agricultural Trade Impacts of the Canada-Chile Free Trade Agreement
7. The name is absent
8. Innovation Trajectories in Honduras’ Coffee Value Chain. Public and Private Influence on the Use of New Knowledge and Technology among Coffee Growers
9. CROSS-COMMODITY PERSPECTIVE ON CONTRACTING: EVIDENCE FROM MISSISSIPPI
10. Top-Down Mass Analysis of Protein Tyrosine Nitration: Comparison of Electron Capture Dissociation with “Slow-Heating” Tandem Mass Spectrometry Methods