Post hoc analyses of children’s responses from the Inference condition revealed that the 6
year-olds performed significantly better than the 4 year-olds [immediate: Mann-Whitney:
Z=2.8, p<.005); delayed post test (Mann-Whitney: Z= 4.2, p<.05)] and the 5 year-olds
[immediate: Mann-Whitney: Z=2.02, p<.05); delayed post test (Mann-Whitney: Z= 2.7,
p<.005)]. Furthermore, the 5 year-olds performed significantly better than the 4 year-olds
during the delayed post test (Mann-Whitney: Z= 2.6, p<.05).
Post hoc analyses of children’s responses from the Definition condition indicated that the 6-
year olds performed significantly better than the 4 year-olds [immediate: Mann-Whitney:
Z=4.5, p<.0000); delayed post test (Mann-Whitney: Z= 3.2, p<.005)] and the 5 year-olds
during the immediate post test: (Mann-Whitney: Z=3.2, p<.005). Furthermore, the 5 year-olds
performed significantly better than the 4 year-olds [immediate: Mann-Whitney: Z=2.4,
p<.05); delayed post test (Mann-Whitney: Z= 2.6, p<.05)].
Post hoc analyses of children’s responses from the Analogy condition demonstrated that the
6 year-olds performed significantly better than the 4 year-olds (immediate: Mann-Whitney:
Z=2.8, p<.005; delayed: Mann-Whitney: Z=2.8, p<.005).The 5 year-olds performed
significantly better than the 4 year-olds during the delayed post test (Mann-Whitney: Z=
2.01, p<.05). No significant differences were found between the 6- and the 5 year-olds.
Post hoc analyses of children’s responses from the Lexical contrast condition indicated that
the 6 year-olds performed significantly better than the 4 year olds (Mann-Whitney: Z= 3.1,
p<.005) and the 5 year-olds (Mann-Whitney: Z= 2.3, p<.05) during the immediate post test.
No significant differences were found between the 4- and the 5 year-olds.
To what extent does children’s performance on the definition task differ by linguistic
condition?
If all children from each linguistic condition were correct on the two target words, the
maximum total score would be 96 for each linguistic condition in each post test. Figure 5.12
below shows children’s performance on the definition task by linguistic condition for both
post tests. The statistical analysis of the immediate post test revealed that there was a trend
for the children in the Inference and Definition conditions to perform better on the definition
task than the children in the Lexical contrast condition. Furthermore, the children in the
138
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. The name is absent
3. A Hybrid Neural Network and Virtual Reality System for Spatial Language Processing
4. Luce Irigaray and divine matter
5. Public Debt Management in Brazil
6. The name is absent
7. The name is absent
8. MULTIMODAL SEMIOTICS OF SPIRITUAL EXPERIENCES: REPRESENTING BELIEFS, METAPHORS, AND ACTIONS
9. Self-Help Groups and Income Generation in the Informal Settlements of Nairobi
10. The name is absent