5.4.3.3 Are there any correlations between children ,s performance
on the naming and the other comprehension tasks
for both post tests ? ............................171
5.5 Overall Conclusions and Discussion OfExperiment 1 ................173
Chapter 6: THE LINK: RATIONALE FOR EXPERIMENT 2...............155
6.1 Whathasbeenfoundsofar? .................................155
6.2 Limitationsofexperimentl..................................157
6.3 The Rationale for the Experiment 2............................159
Chapter 7: EXPERIMENT 2 ...........................................163
7.1 Introduction .................................................163
7.2 Aims and Research questions OfExperiment 2......................163
7.3 Methods....................................................164
7.3.1 Participants.........................................164
7.3.2 Design ...........................................164
7.3.3 Materials ..........................................166
7.3.4 Procedure..........................................167
7.3.4.1 General testing procedure.......................168
7.3.4.2 Pre-test procedure.............................168
7.3.4.3 Intervention procedure..........................169
7.3.4.4 Procedure for the post-test measures ..............170
7.4 Results OfExperiment 2........................................172
7.4.1 The Baseline measures .................................173
7.4.2 The post test measures .................................174
7.4.2.1 The Production measures .......................174
7.4.2.1.1 NamingTask....................174
7.4.2.2 The Understanding measures ....................179
7.4.2.2.1 Multiple choice task ..............181
7.4.2.2.2 Definition task...................187
7.4.2.2.3 Short questions task ..............203
7.4.2.2.4 Association task .................214
7.4.2.2.5 Contrast task....................229