A consistent estimator (as T → ∞) of αi can be obtained from estimating
separate models for all N cross sections. If r = 1, one may use the two-step
estimator suggested by Engle and Granger (1987), whereas for r > 1 the
ML estimator of Johansen (1988, 1991) can be used. However, in the latter
case it is important to re-normalize the cointegration vectors so that they
do not depend on individual specific parameters. Let βbiM L denote the ML
estimator of the cointegration matrix suggested by Johansen (1988, 1991).
.—..
.—..
The estimator is normalized such that βbiML0S11,iβbiML = Ir , where S11,i =
PtT=1 yi,t-1yi0,t-1. Since the distribution of S11,i depends on αi and Σi, the
ML estimator applies an individual specific normalization. To obtain the
same normalization for all cointegration matrices βb1M L , . . . , βbNM L
apply the normalization βbcM,iL = βbiM L (βbiM,1L)
one may
'---- T T
■----H r τ ■---■
'---'H Г т ■-----
-1 = [I, —BbiML]0, where BbiML0
-βbiM,2L(βbiM,1L)-1 and βbiM,1L (βbiM,2L) denotes the upper (lower) r × r (n - r × r)
block of βbiM L .
A problem with such a normalization is that βiM,1L needs not to be in-
vertible and, thus, the normalization may be invalid (see Boswijk 1996 and
Saikkonen 1999). To avoid such problems an estimator can be used that is
based on an eigenvalue problem not depending on nuisance parameters. Such
an estimator is obtained by solving the eigenvalue problem ∖λiI — S 11 J = 0.
The eigenvectors corresponding to the r smallest eigenvalues are called the
Principal Component (PC) estimator of the cointegration vectors (e.g. Har-
ris, 1997). The estimated cointegration matrices βbiP C are normalized as
βbiPC0βbiPC = Ir and, thus, the normalization does not depend on individual
specific parameters.
At the first estimation stage, the restriction that the cointegration vectors
are the same for all cross section units is ignored, but this does not affect
the asymptotic properties of the estimator. For the asymptotic properties of
the two-step estimator it is only required that the parameters are estimated
consistently as T → ∞.
At the second stage, the system is transformed such that the cointegration
matrix β can be estimated by ordinary least-squares of the pooled regression
zbit = β0yi,t-1 + vbit i = 1, . . . , N; t = 1, . . . , T,
(5)
where zbit = (αb0iΣb i-1αbi)-1αb0iΣb i-1∆yit and vbit is defined analogously.
If the cointegration vectors are normalized as β = [I, —B]0, then the
More intriguing information
1. The Importance of Global Shocks for National Policymakers: Rising Challenges for Central Banks2. The Role of Trait Emotional Intelligence (El) in the Workplace.
3. Skills, Partnerships and Tenancy in Sri Lankan Rice Farms
4. ¿Por qué se privatizan servicios en los municipios (pequeños)? Evidencia empírica sobre residuos sólidos y agua.
5. Who’s afraid of critical race theory in education? a reply to Mike Cole’s ‘The color-line and the class struggle’
6. Optimal Taxation of Capital Income in Models with Endogenous Fertility
7. Gender and headship in the twenty-first century
8. An Economic Analysis of Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Consumption: Implications for Overweight and Obesity among Higher- and Lower-Income Consumers
9. The Context of Sense and Sensibility
10. Short- and long-term experience in pulmonary vein segmental ostial ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation*