A parametric approach to the estimation of cointegration vectors in panel data



A consistent estimator (as T → ∞) of αi can be obtained from estimating
separate models for all
N cross sections. If r = 1, one may use the two-step
estimator suggested by Engle and Granger (1987), whereas for
r > 1 the
ML estimator of Johansen (1988, 1991) can be used. However, in the latter
case it is important to re-normalize the cointegration vectors so that they
do not depend on individual specific parameters. Let
βbiM L denote the ML
estimator of the cointegration matrix suggested by Johansen (1988, 1991).


.—..


.—..


The estimator is normalized such that βbiML0S11,iβbiML = Ir , where S11,i =
PtT=1 yi,t-1yi0,t-1. Since the distribution of S11,i depends on αi and Σi, the
ML estimator applies an individual specific normalization. To obtain the


same normalization for all cointegration matrices βb1M L , . . . , βbNM L


apply the normalization βbcM,iL = βbiM L (βbiM,1L)


one may
'---- T T


■----H r τ ■---■


'---'H Г т      ■-----


-1 = [I, —BbiML]0, where BbiML0


biM,2L(βbiM,1L)-1 and βbiM,1L (βbiM,2L) denotes the upper (lower) r × r (n - r × r)
block of
βbiM L .

A problem with such a normalization is that βiM,1L needs not to be in-
vertible and, thus, the normalization may be invalid (see Boswijk 1996 and
Saikkonen 1999). To avoid such problems an estimator can be used that is
based on an eigenvalue problem not depending on nuisance parameters. Such
an estimator is obtained by solving the eigenvalue problem
λiI — S 11 J = 0.
The eigenvectors corresponding to the
r smallest eigenvalues are called the
Principal Component (PC) estimator of the cointegration vectors (e.g. Har-
ris, 1997). The estimated cointegration matrices
βbiP C are normalized as


βbiPC0βbiPC = Ir and, thus, the normalization does not depend on individual
specific parameters.

At the first estimation stage, the restriction that the cointegration vectors
are the same for all cross section units is ignored, but this does not affect
the asymptotic properties of the estimator. For the asymptotic properties of
the two-step estimator it is only required that the parameters are estimated
consistently as
T → ∞.

At the second stage, the system is transformed such that the cointegration
matrix
β can be estimated by ordinary least-squares of the pooled regression


zbit = β0yi,t-1 + vbit   i = 1, . . . , N; t = 1, . . . , T,


(5)


where zbit = (αb0iΣb i-1αbi)-1αb0iΣb i-1yit and vbit is defined analogously.

If the cointegration vectors are normalized as β = [I, —B]0, then the




More intriguing information

1. New Evidence on the Puzzles. Results from Agnostic Identification on Monetary Policy and Exchange Rates.
2. The name is absent
3. Why unwinding preferences is not the same as liberalisation: the case of sugar
4. The name is absent
5. The duration of fixed exchange rate regimes
6. The name is absent
7. Synthesis and biological activity of α-galactosyl ceramide KRN7000 and galactosyl (α1→2) galactosyl ceramide
8. NEW DEVELOPMENTS IN FARM PRICE AND INCOME POLICY PROGRAMS: PART I. SITUATION AND PROBLEM
9. Manufacturing Earnings and Cycles: New Evidence
10. The name is absent
11. Cyclical Changes in Short-Run Earnings Mobility in Canada, 1982-1996
12. Work Rich, Time Poor? Time-Use of Women and Men in Ireland
13. Factores de alteração da composição da Despesa Pública: o caso norte-americano
14. The name is absent
15. Industrial Employment Growth in Spanish Regions - the Role Played by Size, Innovation, and Spatial Aspects
16. The name is absent
17. Spatial patterns in intermunicipal Danish commuting
18. The name is absent
19. Tax systems and tax reforms in Europe: Rationale and open issue for more radical reforms
20. Job quality and labour market performance