References
[1] Bai, J. and S. Ng (2001a) A New Look at Panel Testing of Stationarity
and the PPP Hypothesis, Mimeo, Dept. of Economics, Boston College.
[2] Bai, J. and S. Ng (2001b) A PANIC Attack on Unit Roots and Cointe-
gration, Mimeo, Dept. of Economics, Boston College.
[3] Bai, J. and S. Ng (2002) Determining the Number of Factors in Approx-
imate Factor Models, Econometrica, 70, 191-221.
[4] Baltagi, B.H. and Kao, C.W. (2000) Nonstationary Panels, Cointegra-
tion in Panels and Dynamic Models: A Survey, Advances in Economet-
rics 15, 7-51.
[5] Banerjee, A., M. Marcellino and C. Osbat (2001) Testing for PPP:
Should We Use Panel Methods?, Mimeo, European University Institute.
[6] Coakley, J., A. M. Fuertes and Smith, R. (2001) Small Sample Proper-
ties of Panel Time-Series Estimators with I(1) Errors, Birkbeck College
Discussion Paper 03/2001.
[7] Hall, S., Lazarova, S. and G. Urga (1999) A Principal Components Anal-
ysis of Common Stochastic Trends in Heterogeneous Panel Data, Oxford
Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 749-64.
[8] Moon, H. R. and B. Perron (2001) Testing for a Unit Root in Panels
with Dynamic Factors, Mimeo, Department of Economics, University of
Southern California.
[9] O’Connell, P.J.G. (1998) The Overvaluation of Purchasing Power Parity.
Journal of International Economics 44: 1-19.
[10] Pedroni, P. (1997) Cross Sectional Dependence in Cointegration Tests
of Purchasing Power Parity in Panels, Mimeo, Indiana University.
[11] Pesaran, M.H. and R. Smith (1995) Estimating Long-Run Relationships
from Dynamic Heterogeneous Panels, Journal of Econometrics 68, 79-
113.
[12] Phillips, P.C.B., and H.R. Moon (1999) Linear regression theory for
nonstationary panel data, Econometrica 67, 1057-1111.
19
More intriguing information
1. Changing spatial planning systems and the role of the regional government level; Comparing the Netherlands, Flanders and England2. The name is absent
3. On Social and Market Sanctions in Deterring non Compliance in Pollution Standards
4. The name is absent
5. Expectation Formation and Endogenous Fluctuations in Aggregate Demand
6. THE CHANGING RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
7. Naïve Bayes vs. Decision Trees vs. Neural Networks in the Classification of Training Web Pages
8. The name is absent
9. Heterogeneity of Investors and Asset Pricing in a Risk-Value World
10. The name is absent