A Principal Components Approach to Cross-Section Dependence in Panels



References

[1] Bai, J. and S. Ng (2001a) A New Look at Panel Testing of Stationarity
and the PPP Hypothesis, Mimeo, Dept. of Economics, Boston College.

[2] Bai, J. and S. Ng (2001b) A PANIC Attack on Unit Roots and Cointe-
gration, Mimeo, Dept. of Economics, Boston College.

[3] Bai, J. and S. Ng (2002) Determining the Number of Factors in Approx-
imate Factor Models, Econometrica, 70, 191-221.

[4] Baltagi, B.H. and Kao, C.W. (2000) Nonstationary Panels, Cointegra-
tion in Panels and Dynamic Models: A Survey, Advances in Economet-
rics 15, 7-51.

[5] Banerjee, A., M. Marcellino and C. Osbat (2001) Testing for PPP:
Should We Use Panel Methods?, Mimeo, European University Institute.

[6] Coakley, J., A. M. Fuertes and Smith, R. (2001) Small Sample Proper-
ties of Panel Time-Series Estimators with I(1) Errors, Birkbeck College
Discussion Paper 03/2001.

[7] Hall, S., Lazarova, S. and G. Urga (1999) A Principal Components Anal-
ysis of Common Stochastic Trends in Heterogeneous Panel Data, Oxford
Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 749-64.

[8] Moon, H. R. and B. Perron (2001) Testing for a Unit Root in Panels
with Dynamic Factors, Mimeo, Department of Economics, University of
Southern California.

[9] O’Connell, P.J.G. (1998) The Overvaluation of Purchasing Power Parity.
Journal of International Economics 44: 1-19.

[10] Pedroni, P. (1997) Cross Sectional Dependence in Cointegration Tests
of Purchasing Power Parity in Panels, Mimeo, Indiana University.

[11] Pesaran, M.H. and R. Smith (1995) Estimating Long-Run Relationships
from Dynamic Heterogeneous Panels, Journal of Econometrics 68, 79-
113.

[12] Phillips, P.C.B., and H.R. Moon (1999) Linear regression theory for
nonstationary panel data, Econometrica 67, 1057-1111.

19



More intriguing information

1. The name is absent
2. PROTECTING CONTRACT GROWERS OF BROILER CHICKEN INDUSTRY
3. Making International Human Rights Protection More Effective: A Rational-Choice Approach to the Effectiveness of Ius Standi Provisions
4. Research Design, as Independent of Methods
5. Industrial Cores and Peripheries in Brazil
6. Temporary Work in Turbulent Times: The Swedish Experience
7. The Structure Performance Hypothesis and The Efficient Structure Performance Hypothesis-Revisited: The Case of Agribusiness Commodity and Food Products Truck Carriers in the South
8. Modeling industrial location decisions in U.S. counties
9. The name is absent
10. Estimated Open Economy New Keynesian Phillips Curves for the G7
11. Tastes, castes, and culture: The influence of society on preferences
12. The name is absent
13. SOME ISSUES CONCERNING SPECIFICATION AND INTERPRETATION OF OUTDOOR RECREATION DEMAND MODELS
14. The name is absent
15. Improving behaviour classification consistency: a technique from biological taxonomy
16. Analyzing the Agricultural Trade Impacts of the Canada-Chile Free Trade Agreement
17. Dual Track Reforms: With and Without Losers
18. The name is absent
19. The name is absent
20. Investment in Next Generation Networks and the Role of Regulation: A Real Option Approach