121
Individual work at 5th grade fit this category. This suggests that pupils vary in their
perceptions of the frequency of deployment of Teacher explanation and individual work
where individuals’ own speed of working will affect how much they can achieve in the
amount of time allowed by the teacher. This may determine the extent to which they feel
they are involved in mathematics learning. Some teaching methods have a wide
distribution in the reported frequency of deployment in only the teachers’ responses.
Reading a textbook at 5th grade and discussion-style teaching methods at 8th grade fit
this category.
There was a wide distribution in many of the responses from the pupils in the extent to
which individual teaching methods were perceived to promote positive affective
attitudes, which suggests that their responses were strongly affected by personal
preferences.
To conclude, the range of teaching methods adopted was relatively narrow as reported
by both pupils and teachers, and became increasingly so as pupils moved to 8th grade.
Few of the methods adopted were perceived by either pupils or teachers to promote
positive attitudes towards learning mathematics.
121
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. On Social and Market Sanctions in Deterring non Compliance in Pollution Standards
3. Parallel and overlapping Human Immunodeficiency Virus, Hepatitis B and C virus Infections among pregnant women in the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja, Nigeria
4. DISCRIMINATORY APPROACH TO AUDITORY STIMULI IN GUINEA FOWL (NUMIDA MELEAGRIS) AFTER HYPERSTRIATAL∕HIPPOCAMP- AL BRAIN DAMAGE
5. The name is absent
6. Survey of Literature on Covered and Uncovered Interest Parities
7. Imperfect competition and congestion in the City
8. Inflation Targeting and Nonlinear Policy Rules: The Case of Asymmetric Preferences (new title: The Fed's monetary policy rule and U.S. inflation: The case of asymmetric preferences)
9. The Importance of Global Shocks for National Policymakers: Rising Challenges for Central Banks
10. Three Strikes and You.re Out: Reply to Cooper and Willis