5th and 8th grade pupils’ and teachers’ perceptions of the relationships between teaching methods, classroom ethos, and positive affective attitudes towards learning mathematics in Japan



242

5th grade teachers seemed to see relationships between improvement of satisfaction and
enjoyment promoted by
Practical work, improvement of cohesiveness and sense of
progress promoted by
Group discussion, and reduction of difficulties and motivation
promoted by
Individual work. 5th grade teachers attempting to improve class
cohesiveness and reduce pupils’ difficulties reported more frequent deployment of
Group
discussion.

8th grade teachers seemed to see relationships between improvement of satisfaction and
motivation promoted by
Individual help, and improvement of cohesiveness and sense of
security promoted by
Whole-class discussion. 8th grade teachers who believed that
competition could be used for improving pupils’ motivation perceived that
Individual work
could promote enjoyment. 8th grade teachers attempting to improve pupils’ satisfaction
reported more frequent deployment of
Individual help than other teachers. There were
no other differences in teachers’ reported frequency of deployment of teaching methods
according to their perceptions of classroom ethos. The findings suggest that 5th grade
teachers view improvement of classroom ethos in relation to
Group discussion and
Practical work, while 8th grade teachers think of it in relation to individualised teaching
methods (see Table 7.3.6).

Table 7.3.6: Teachers’ perceptions of affective attitudes promoted by teaching methods
according to higher and lower means of their classroom ethos

Low scores____________

High scores___________

N____

M___

SD

N____

M___

SD

5⅛

Satisfaction

Enjoyment

Practical work

t=2.807, df=41, p<.01

18____

4.28

.57

25___

4.72

.46

8th

Satisfaction

Motivation

Individual help

t=2.777, df=38, p<.01

24____

3.83

.70

16____

4.44

.63

8th

Satisfaction

Deployment

Individual help

t=3.052, df=38, p<.01

24___

3.67

.82

16____

4.44

.73

5⅛

Cohesiveness

Progress

Group
discussion

t=3.029, df=45, p<.01

28

3.43

.63

19

4.11

.81

5th

Cohesiveness

Deployment

Group
discussion

t=4.342,      df=29.166,

p<.01_____________________

~28

2.04

.64

19

3.11

.94

8*

Cohesiveness

Security

Whole-class
discussion

t=3.366, df=32.587,
p<.01_____________________

Із

2.92

.49

~26

3.58

.70

5⅛

Difficulty_________

Motivation

Individual work

t=3.709, df=45, p<.01

18

3.22

~~81~

29

3.97

.57

5th

Difficulty

Deployment

Group
discussion

t=2-802, df=44.916,
p<.01_____________________

18

2.06

.64

29

2.72

1.00

8lh

Competition

Enjoyment

Individual work

t=2.805,      df=37.210,

p<.01_____________________

__

3.17

.39

^^30

3.67

.76

Summary of 7.3

Pupils of both age groups, overall, experienced relatively low satisfaction and moderate
levels of difficulty in mathematics classes, although no significant correlations between

242



More intriguing information

1. Globalization and the benefits of trade
2. TRADE NEGOTIATIONS AND THE FUTURE OF AMERICAN AGRICULTURE
3. APPLYING BIOSOLIDS: ISSUES FOR VIRGINIA AGRICULTURE
4. Improving Business Cycle Forecasts’ Accuracy - What Can We Learn from Past Errors?
5. The name is absent
6. How Low Business Tax Rates Attract Multinational Headquarters: Municipality-Level Evidence from Germany
7. The name is absent
8. AGRICULTURAL TRADE LIBERALIZATION UNDER NAFTA: REPORTING ON THE REPORT CARD
9. Magnetic Resonance Imaging in patients with ICDs and Pacemakers
10. Economie de l’entrepreneur faits et théories (The economics of entrepreneur facts and theories)