5th and 8th grade pupils’ and teachers’ perceptions of the relationships between teaching methods, classroom ethos, and positive affective attitudes towards learning mathematics in Japan



242

5th grade teachers seemed to see relationships between improvement of satisfaction and
enjoyment promoted by
Practical work, improvement of cohesiveness and sense of
progress promoted by
Group discussion, and reduction of difficulties and motivation
promoted by
Individual work. 5th grade teachers attempting to improve class
cohesiveness and reduce pupils’ difficulties reported more frequent deployment of
Group
discussion.

8th grade teachers seemed to see relationships between improvement of satisfaction and
motivation promoted by
Individual help, and improvement of cohesiveness and sense of
security promoted by
Whole-class discussion. 8th grade teachers who believed that
competition could be used for improving pupils’ motivation perceived that
Individual work
could promote enjoyment. 8th grade teachers attempting to improve pupils’ satisfaction
reported more frequent deployment of
Individual help than other teachers. There were
no other differences in teachers’ reported frequency of deployment of teaching methods
according to their perceptions of classroom ethos. The findings suggest that 5th grade
teachers view improvement of classroom ethos in relation to
Group discussion and
Practical work, while 8th grade teachers think of it in relation to individualised teaching
methods (see Table 7.3.6).

Table 7.3.6: Teachers’ perceptions of affective attitudes promoted by teaching methods
according to higher and lower means of their classroom ethos

Low scores____________

High scores___________

N____

M___

SD

N____

M___

SD

5⅛

Satisfaction

Enjoyment

Practical work

t=2.807, df=41, p<.01

18____

4.28

.57

25___

4.72

.46

8th

Satisfaction

Motivation

Individual help

t=2.777, df=38, p<.01

24____

3.83

.70

16____

4.44

.63

8th

Satisfaction

Deployment

Individual help

t=3.052, df=38, p<.01

24___

3.67

.82

16____

4.44

.73

5⅛

Cohesiveness

Progress

Group
discussion

t=3.029, df=45, p<.01

28

3.43

.63

19

4.11

.81

5th

Cohesiveness

Deployment

Group
discussion

t=4.342,      df=29.166,

p<.01_____________________

~28

2.04

.64

19

3.11

.94

8*

Cohesiveness

Security

Whole-class
discussion

t=3.366, df=32.587,
p<.01_____________________

Із

2.92

.49

~26

3.58

.70

5⅛

Difficulty_________

Motivation

Individual work

t=3.709, df=45, p<.01

18

3.22

~~81~

29

3.97

.57

5th

Difficulty

Deployment

Group
discussion

t=2-802, df=44.916,
p<.01_____________________

18

2.06

.64

29

2.72

1.00

8lh

Competition

Enjoyment

Individual work

t=2.805,      df=37.210,

p<.01_____________________

__

3.17

.39

^^30

3.67

.76

Summary of 7.3

Pupils of both age groups, overall, experienced relatively low satisfaction and moderate
levels of difficulty in mathematics classes, although no significant correlations between

242



More intriguing information

1. Cancer-related electronic support groups as navigation-aids: Overcoming geographic barriers
2. The name is absent
3. Macroeconomic Interdependence in a Two-Country DSGE Model under Diverging Interest-Rate Rules
4. Olive Tree Farming in Jaen: Situation With the New Cap and Comparison With the Province Income Per Capita.
5. Putting Globalization and Concentration in the Agri-food Sector into Context
6. Activation of s28-dependent transcription in Escherichia coli by the cyclic AMP receptor protein requires an unusual promoter organization
7. Estimating the Technology of Cognitive and Noncognitive Skill Formation
8. The name is absent
9. Why unwinding preferences is not the same as liberalisation: the case of sugar
10. AN IMPROVED 2D OPTICAL FLOW SENSOR FOR MOTION SEGMENTATION