242
5th grade teachers seemed to see relationships between improvement of satisfaction and
enjoyment promoted by Practical work, improvement of cohesiveness and sense of
progress promoted by Group discussion, and reduction of difficulties and motivation
promoted by Individual work. 5th grade teachers attempting to improve class
cohesiveness and reduce pupils’ difficulties reported more frequent deployment of Group
discussion.
8th grade teachers seemed to see relationships between improvement of satisfaction and
motivation promoted by Individual help, and improvement of cohesiveness and sense of
security promoted by Whole-class discussion. 8th grade teachers who believed that
competition could be used for improving pupils’ motivation perceived that Individual work
could promote enjoyment. 8th grade teachers attempting to improve pupils’ satisfaction
reported more frequent deployment of Individual help than other teachers. There were
no other differences in teachers’ reported frequency of deployment of teaching methods
according to their perceptions of classroom ethos. The findings suggest that 5th grade
teachers view improvement of classroom ethos in relation to Group discussion and
Practical work, while 8th grade teachers think of it in relation to individualised teaching
methods (see Table 7.3.6).
Table 7.3.6: Teachers’ perceptions of affective attitudes promoted by teaching methods
according to higher and lower means of their classroom ethos
Low scores____________ |
High scores___________ | |||||||||
N____ |
M___ |
SD |
N____ |
M___ |
SD | |||||
5⅛ |
Satisfaction |
Enjoyment |
Practical work |
t=2.807, df=41, p<.01 |
18____ |
4.28 |
.57 |
25___ |
4.72 |
.46 |
8th |
Satisfaction |
Motivation |
Individual help |
t=2.777, df=38, p<.01 |
24____ |
3.83 |
.70 |
16____ |
4.44 |
.63 |
8th |
Satisfaction |
Deployment |
Individual help |
t=3.052, df=38, p<.01 |
24___ |
3.67 |
.82 |
16____ |
4.44 |
.73 |
5⅛ |
Cohesiveness |
Progress |
Group |
t=3.029, df=45, p<.01 |
28 |
3.43 |
.63 |
19 |
4.11 |
.81 |
5th |
Cohesiveness |
Deployment |
Group |
t=4.342, df=29.166, p<.01_____________________ |
~28 |
2.04 |
.64 |
19 |
3.11 |
.94 |
8* |
Cohesiveness |
Security |
Whole-class |
t=3.366, df=32.587, |
Із |
2.92 |
.49 |
~26 |
3.58 |
.70 |
5⅛ |
Difficulty_________ |
Motivation |
Individual work |
t=3.709, df=45, p<.01 |
18 |
3.22 |
~~81~ |
29 |
3.97 |
.57 |
5th |
Difficulty |
Deployment |
Group |
t=2-802, df=44.916, |
18 |
2.06 |
.64 |
29 |
2.72 |
1.00 |
8lh |
Competition |
Enjoyment |
Individual work |
t=2.805, df=37.210, p<.01_____________________ |
__ |
3.17 |
.39 |
^^30 |
3.67 |
.76 |
Summary of 7.3
Pupils of both age groups, overall, experienced relatively low satisfaction and moderate
levels of difficulty in mathematics classes, although no significant correlations between
242