5th and 8th grade pupils’ and teachers’ perceptions of the relationships between teaching methods, classroom ethos, and positive affective attitudes towards learning mathematics in Japan



240

difficulties at both grades, although the correlation was stronger at 8th grade. The degree
of teachers’ reported attempts to improve pupils’ cohesiveness was positively correlated
with the degree of their reported attempts to improve their pupils’ satisfaction and their
reported attempts to reduce their pupils’ difficulties at 5th grade. These correlations were
not found at 8th grade which suggests that 8th grade teachers do not tend to believe that
cohesiveness in mathematics classes is linked to pupils’ satisfaction or reduction of
difficulties (see Table 7.3.5).

Table 7.3.5: Correlation between five factors of classroom ethos, among the teachers’

responses

5tn grade teachers

8th grade teachers

Improvement of Cohesiveness
x Improvement of Satisfaction

N=43, r=.504, p=.001

Improvement of Satisfaction x
Reduction of Difficulties________

N=43, r=.463, p=.002

N=40, r=.580, p=.000

Improvement of Cohesiveness
x Reduction of Difficulties______

N=47, r=.392, p=.006

Teachers’ perceptions of classroom ethos and their perceptions of teaching
methods

Teachers were divided into two groups in terms of their perceptions of classroom ethos.
Their perceptions of the effects and deployment of particular teaching methods were
compared between groups, using an Independent t-test. Firstly, the way that teacher
participants were divided into two groups is explained.

Satisfaction - Most teachers expressed high to moderate levels of attempting to improve
pupils’ satisfaction in mathematics classes, although the percentage of teachers who
scored higher marks was greater at 5th than 8th grade. The mean scores for improving
pupils’ satisfaction at 5th grade was 3.63 (SD=. 85, median = 4.00). 5th grade teachers
were divided into those who scored at least 4 (58.1%) or below 4 (41.9%). The mean
s∞res for improving satisfaction of 8th grade teachers was 3.28 (SD=. 93, median =
3.00). 8th grade teachers were divided into those who scored at least 4 (40.0%) or below
4 (60%).

Cohesiveness - Most teachers expressed moderate levels of attempting to improve
cohesiveness in the classroom, although the percentage of teachers scoring high marks

240



More intriguing information

1. Cultural Diversity and Human Rights: a propos of a minority educational reform
2. Output Effects of Agri-environmental Programs of the EU
3. The name is absent
4. EMU: some unanswered questions
5. Weather Forecasting for Weather Derivatives
6. The Clustering of Financial Services in London*
7. The name is absent
8. Wettbewerbs- und Industriepolitik - EU-Integration als Dritter Weg?
9. The Prohibition of the Proposed Springer-ProSiebenSat.1-Merger: How much Economics in German Merger Control?
10. Developmental changes in the theta response system: a single sweep analysis
11. The name is absent
12. The name is absent
13. The name is absent
14. Special and Differential Treatment in the WTO Agricultural Negotiations
15. A model-free approach to delta hedging
16. CURRENT CHALLENGES FOR AGRICULTURAL POLICY
17. Consciousness, cognition, and the hierarchy of context: extending the global neuronal workspace model
18. Conditions for learning: partnerships for engaging secondary pupils with contemporary art.
19. The name is absent
20. CREDIT SCORING, LOAN PRICING, AND FARM BUSINESS PERFORMANCE