5th and 8th grade pupils’ and teachers’ perceptions of the relationships between teaching methods, classroom ethos, and positive affective attitudes towards learning mathematics in Japan



245

7.4: Goal setting reflected in teachers’ praise

Pupils ’ perceptions

In the questionnaire survey, pupils were asked to what extent they perceived that their
mathematics teachers praised them according to the following four criteria:

• when pupils get good results in Maths tests, compared to other pupils;

• when pupils have improved the results of Maths tests over their previous results;

• when pupils make more effort in Maths, compared to other pupils;

• when pupils make more effort in Maths than before.

Pupils’ perceptions of teachers’ praise were measured with five-point rating scales. They
were also asked to what extent they were happy to receive praise from their teacher.

Overall, pupils of both age groups perceived that their teachers hardly ever praised
them, although there was a relatively wide distribution of responses. Pupils of both age
groups perceived differences in the extent to which they were praised for different
reasons. 5th graders perceived that their teachers gave praise for effort more than
results, while 8th graders perceived that their teachers praised them based on absolute
comparisons, such as improvement in results or more effort than before, more than for
relative comparisons with other pupils (see Figure 7.4.1). 5th graders were more likely to
perceive that their teachers praised them based on effort than 8th graders, while 8th
graders were more likely to perceive that their teachers praised them based on results
than 5th graders. This difference was statistically significant (see Table 7.4.1 and Figure
7.4.1).

Table 7.4.1: Mean scores and Standard Deviation of pupils’ perceptions of the extent to
which mathematics teachers praised them

5th graders

8tn graders

N____

M

SD

N____

M___

SD

Better results than others
t=6.878, df=3277.287, p<.01_______________

1465

2.24

1.19

2087

2.53

1.28

Improvement of results than before
t=6.281, df=3558, p<.01    _______________

1467

2.49

1.29

2093

2.78

1.33

More effort than others
t=4.476, df=3024.296, p<.01_______________

1469

2.81

1.36

2092

^∑61

1.27

More effort than before
t=3.858, df=3033.615, p<.01___________

1467

2.93

1.40

2093

2.75

1.32

Repeated measure ANOVA

F (2.649, 3873.533)
=227.514, p<. 01________

F(2.649,5514.807)

=67.364, p<. 01_________

245



More intriguing information

1. Une Gestion des ressources humaines à l'interface des organisations : vers une GRH territoriale ?
2. Behaviour-based Knowledge Systems: An Epigenetic Path from Behaviour to Knowledge
3. The name is absent
4. Popular Conceptions of Nationhood in Old and New European
5. Accurate, fast and stable denoising source separation algorithms
6. Human Resource Management Practices and Wage Dispersion in U.S. Establishments
7. Robust Econometrics
8. The name is absent
9. Imperfect competition and congestion in the City
10. Der Einfluß der Direktdemokratie auf die Sozialpolitik
11. The name is absent
12. Concerns for Equity and the Optimal Co-Payments for Publicly Provided Health Care
13. The name is absent
14. The name is absent
15. ‘I’m so much more myself now, coming back to work’ - working class mothers, paid work and childcare.
16. Trade Liberalization, Firm Performance and Labour Market Outcomes in the Developing World: What Can We Learn from Micro-LevelData?
17. Beyond Networks? A brief response to ‘Which networks matter in education governance?’
18. Uncertain Productivity Growth and the Choice between FDI and Export
19. Gender stereotyping and wage discrimination among Italian graduates
20. Dual Track Reforms: With and Without Losers