Spatial agglomeration and business groups: new evidence from Italian industrial districts



among smaller firms, while outside industrial districts the presence of the groups is more
dependent on the size of the firm. This confirms the hypothesis that firms in industrial
districts (even the smaller ones) are favoured in seizing new business opportunities, both by
setting up new firms or by acquiring established ones.

According to Proposition 2 groups in industrial districts should have a lower degree of
diversification than business groups outside industrial districts. To verify this proposition
we calculated an index of the degree of specialization of groups, defined as the ratio of the
overall employees of the group that belong to the same sector of the largest company (that
in the case of district groups is the same of the district sector). Though this is not a proper
index of diversification, it is appropriate to the hypothesis investigated: i.e. that groups in
industrial districts tend to expand their activities in the sector characterising the district. To
test this hypothesis we calculated t-tests of means differences between district and non-
district groups.

The data confirm this hypothesis (Table 5)6. As expected, the degree of diversification
of groups is very low, both for district and non district groups. Indeed, several studies have
demonstrated that firms tend to diversify in activities that show a high degree of coherence
(synergy) with existing activities (TEECE
et al., 1994). This is even more valid for the
groups examined as for the most part they are composed of small firms. Nevertheless the
degree of specialization of groups located in industrial districts is significantly higher than
that of groups located outside industrial districts, thus confirming the hypothesis suggested
by BRIOSCHI
et al. (2002) of the prevalence in industrial districts of a specific type of
business groups that they define as a “district group”.

Table 5 - Degree of specialization of business groups

District

____________________________Groups____

Non-district
_____
groups______

Test of diff.
of means

N. of

Degree

N. of

Degree

t

Sig.

groups

of spec.

groups

Of spec.

(1 tail)

Food (17)

46

.89

685

.87

.48

.316

Textile and clothing (68)

477

.92

545

.89

3.08***

.001

Leather and footwear (28)

141

.93

178

.89

2.82***

.003

Furniture (39)

39

.89

82

.83

1.76**

.040

Mechanics (33)

826

.92

3329

.90

3.43***

.001

Other sectors (14)_________

197

.91

2516

.88

2.59***

.005

*** significant at 1%, ** significant at 5%, * significant at 10%

Proposition 3 suggests that groups located in industrial districts should tend to expand
within the same district area, both when setting up or acquiring new companies. To verify

13



More intriguing information

1. Dynamiques des Entreprises Agroalimentaires (EAA) du Languedoc-Roussillon : évolutions 1998-2003. Programme de recherche PSDR 2001-2006 financé par l'Inra et la Région Languedoc-Roussillon
2. Monetary Discretion, Pricing Complementarity and Dynamic Multiple Equilibria
3. A Principal Components Approach to Cross-Section Dependence in Panels
4. The name is absent
5. The name is absent
6. Non Linear Contracting and Endogenous Buyer Power between Manufacturers and Retailers: Empirical Evidence on Food Retailing in France
7. Government spending composition, technical change and wage inequality
8. The name is absent
9. From music student to professional: the process of transition
10. Economic Evaluation of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) in Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), CHERE Working Paper 2007/6
11. The name is absent
12. Ongoing Emergence: A Core Concept in Epigenetic Robotics
13. THE USE OF EXTRANEOUS INFORMATION IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF A POLICY SIMULATION MODEL
14. The Role of State Trading Enterprises and Their Impact on Agricultural Development and Economic Growth in Developing Countries
15. The name is absent
16. Howard Gardner : the myth of Multiple Intelligences
17. Importing Feminist Criticism
18. SOME ISSUES CONCERNING SPECIFICATION AND INTERPRETATION OF OUTDOOR RECREATION DEMAND MODELS
19. Strategic monetary policy in a monetary union with non-atomistic wage setters
20. Consumption Behaviour in Zambia: The Link to Poverty Alleviation?