Example (for three countries)
Co-occurrences in the Science Citation Index:
|
FRANCE - FRA FRANCE - UK: FRANCE - GER |
NCE: 250 UK - FR |
ANCE: 120 GERMANY - FRANCE: |
140 90 750 |
|
80 UK - U |
: 800 GERMANY - UK: | ||
|
MANY: 160 UK - GE |
RMANY: 110 GERMANY - GERMANY: | ||
|
Collaboration matrix:18 FRANCE FRANCE 250 UK 100 GERMANY 150 SUM 500 Frequency matrix: FRANCE FRANCE q11 = 0.10 UK q12 = 0.04 GERMANY q13 = 0.06 (q1. = 0.20) Tij-values: FRANCE FRANCE T11= ln(0.10/0.04)= 0.92 |
UK GERMANY SUM 100 150 500 800 100 1000 100 750 1000 1000 1000 2500 UK GERMANY q21 = 0.04 q31 = 0.06 (q.1 = 0.20) q22 = 0.32 q32 = 0.04 (q.2 = 0.40) q23 = 0.04 q33 = 0.30 (q.3 = 0.40) (q2. = 0.40) (q3. = 0.40) (q.. = 1.00) UK GERMANY T21= ln(0.04/0.08)= -0.69 T31= ln(0.06/0.08)= |
-0.29 | |
|
UK |
T12= ln(0.04/0.08)= -0.69 |
T22= ln(0.32/0.16)= 0.69 T32= ln(0.04/0.16)= |
-1.39 |
|
GERMANY |
T13= ln(0.06/0.08)= -0.29 |
T23= ln(0.04/0.16)= -1.39 T33= ln(0.30/0.16)= |
0.63 |
Integration indicators :
T = (0.10 ∙ 0.92) + (0.04 ∙ -0.69) + (0.06 ∙ -0.29) + (0.04 ∙ -0.69) + (0.32 ∙ 0.69) + (0.04 ∙ -1.39) + (0.06 ∙
-0.29) + (0.04 ∙ -1.39) + (0.30 ∙ 0.63) = 0.30
Ti=j = (1/0.72) ∙ ((0.10 ∙ 0.92) + (0.32 ∙ 0.69) + (0.30 ∙0. 63)) = 0.70
Ti j= (1/0.28) ∙ ((0.04 ∙ -0.69) + (0.06 ∙ -0.29) + (0.04 ∙ -0.69) + (0.04 ∙ -1.39) + (0.06 ∙ -0.29) + (0.04 ∙ -
1.39)) = -0.72
T1 = (1/0.2) ∙ ((0.10 ∙ 0.92) + (0.04 ∙ -0.69) + (0.06 ∙ -0.29)) = 0.23
T2 = (1/0.4) ∙ ((0.04 ∙ -0.69) + (0.32 ∙ 0.69) + (0.04 ∙ -1.39)) = 0.35
T3 = (1/0.4) ∙ ((0.06 ∙ -0.29) + (0.04 ∙ -1.39) + (0.30 ∙ 0.63)) = 0.29
Table 1. Example of application of integration indicators
18 An address that is listed before or after another address is treated in the same way. The share of
collaborations between two different countries is therefore computed as half the mean to obtain qij=qji.
19
More intriguing information
1. The Role of Immigration in Sustaining the Social Security System: A Political Economy Approach2. Family, social security and social insurance: General remarks and the present discussion in Germany as a case study
3. Evaluation of the Development Potential of Russian Cities
4. The Impact of EU Accession in Romania: An Analysis of Regional Development Policy Effects by a Multiregional I-O Model
5. Financial Development and Sectoral Output Growth in 19th Century Germany
6. The name is absent
7. Firm Creation, Firm Evolution and Clusters in Chile’s Dynamic Wine Sector: Evidence from the Colchagua and Casablanca Regions
8. Insurance within the firm
9. Accurate and robust image superresolution by neural processing of local image representations
10. Examining the Regional Aspect of Foreign Direct Investment to Developing Countries