Table V.- Estimation Results.
|
PROV1 |
PROV2 |
PROV3 |
PROV4 |
ALL | |
|
Gibrat’s equation | |||||
|
Constant |
0.3261 |
0.7832** |
0.4407 |
0.9593* |
0.6870* |
|
(0.45) |
(2.38) |
(0.85) |
(1.72) |
(1.88) | |
|
Log Si90 |
0.7763*** |
0.8294*** |
1.0443*** |
0.8279*** |
0.8227*** |
|
(9.10) |
(12.21) |
(7.90) |
(6.93) |
(18.54) | |
|
Log Age |
-0.2408 |
-0.1434 |
-0.0362 |
-0.2492 |
-0.2015*** |
|
(1.64) |
(1.22) |
(0.21) |
(1.30) |
(2.76) | |
|
Log Si90*LogAge |
0.0314 |
0.0129 |
-0.0300 |
0.0280 |
0.0230 |
|
(1.13) |
(0.55) |
(0.73) |
(0.73) |
(1.58) | |
|
RESJUR |
0.1290 |
0.1087 |
-0.0369 |
0.0153 |
0.0293 |
|
(1.12) |
(1.23) |
(0.29) |
(0.11) |
(0.51) | |
|
INNPRO |
0.1059 |
0.0718 |
-0.1800 |
-0.1060 |
0.0282 |
|
(0.98) |
(0.87) |
(1.60) |
(0.91) |
(0.41) | |
|
INNPRC |
0.6739** |
0.1594 |
0.0396 |
0.1512 |
0.2913* |
|
(2.25) |
(1.38) |
(0.27) |
(0.95) |
(1.82) | |
|
TECHIGH |
0.1052 |
0.0095 |
0.2401* |
0.2033 |
0.1216** |
|
(0.94) |
(0.10) |
(1.73) |
(1.54) |
(2.23) | |
|
TECMED |
0.0232 |
-0.0795 |
0.0897 |
0.0531 |
0.0332 |
|
(0.22) |
(1.01) |
(0.87) |
(0.41) |
(0.66) | |
|
Select equation | |||||
|
Constant |
-2.6387*** |
0.5591 |
0.2452 |
-1.1065 |
-0.9764 |
|
(3.86) |
(0.56) |
(0.27) |
(0.75) |
(2.41) | |
|
Log Si90 |
0.1933 |
-0.3806* |
-0.1001 |
0.4515 |
0.0642 |
|
(1.24) |
(1.67) |
(0.43) |
(1.12) |
(0.66) | |
|
Log Age |
0.3290 |
-0.2314 |
-0.1675 |
0.2118 |
0.1468 |
|
(1.34) |
(0.52) |
(0.50) |
(0.44) |
(0.97) | |
|
Log Si90*LogAge |
-0.0436 |
0.1310 |
0.0584 |
-0.0859 |
-0.0096 |
|
(0.84) |
(1.37) |
(0.74) |
(0.73) |
(0.29) | |
|
RESJUR |
0.1742 |
0.2645 |
-0.6824*** |
-0.4030 |
-0.1717 |
|
(0.90) |
(1.04) |
(2.94) |
(1.25) |
(1.54) | |
|
INNPRO |
0.3409** |
0.7145*** |
0.6748*** |
0.4191 |
0.4817*** |
|
(1.99) |
(2.96) |
(3.53) |
(1.47) |
(4.92) | |
|
INNPRC |
1.5431*** |
0.8334*** |
1.1887*** |
0.7157** |
1.146*** |
|
(5.21) |
(3.30) |
(6.07) |
(2.33) |
(11.36) | |
|
TECHIGH |
0.3311* |
0.3620 |
-0.4392* |
0.1086 |
0.0637 |
|
(1.68) |
(1.09) |
(1.70) |
(0.33) |
(0.52) | |
|
TECMED |
0.2771 |
0.2172 |
-0.1262 |
0.7600** |
0.1733 |
|
(1.55) |
(0.86) |
(0.61) |
(2.07) |
(1.65) | |
|
Rho |
0.4813 |
-0.6357 |
-0.6175 |
-0.1693 |
0.0597 |
|
Sigma |
0.6046 |
0.5192 |
0.6373 |
0.5460 |
0.5552 |
|
Lambda |
0.2910 |
-0.3300 |
-0.3935 |
-0.0924 |
0.0332 |
|
Log likelihood |
-350.577 |
-249.983 |
-296.455 |
-167.004 |
-1140.677 |
|
LR test(1) |
0.25 |
1.20 |
1.33 |
0.14 |
0.02 |
|
Test for β1 = 1(2 |
6.88*** |
6.31** |
0.11 |
2.08 |
15.96*** |
|
N° observations |
369 |
271 |
276 |
157 |
1073 |
|
Censored |
167 |
37 |
88 |
30 |
322 |
|
Uncensored |
202 |
234 |
188 |
127 |
751 |
*** Significant at 99%; ** Significant atl 95%; * Significant at 90%..
t- values in parentheses.
11
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. Gianluigi Zenti, President, Academia Barilla SpA - The Changing Consumer: Demanding but Predictable
3. Before and After the Hartz Reforms: The Performance of Active Labour Market Policy in Germany
4. The name is absent
5. AN ANALYTICAL METHOD TO CALCULATE THE ERGODIC AND DIFFERENCE MATRICES OF THE DISCOUNTED MARKOV DECISION PROCESSES
6. The name is absent
7. Integration, Regional Specialization and Growth Differentials in EU Acceding Countries: Evidence from Hungary
8. Ongoing Emergence: A Core Concept in Epigenetic Robotics
9. APPLICATIONS OF DUALITY THEORY TO AGRICULTURE
10. Industrial districts, innovation and I-district effect: territory or industrial specialization?