Table V.- Estimation Results.
PROV1 |
PROV2 |
PROV3 |
PROV4 |
ALL | |
Gibrat’s equation | |||||
Constant |
0.3261 |
0.7832** |
0.4407 |
0.9593* |
0.6870* |
(0.45) |
(2.38) |
(0.85) |
(1.72) |
(1.88) | |
Log Si90 |
0.7763*** |
0.8294*** |
1.0443*** |
0.8279*** |
0.8227*** |
(9.10) |
(12.21) |
(7.90) |
(6.93) |
(18.54) | |
Log Age |
-0.2408 |
-0.1434 |
-0.0362 |
-0.2492 |
-0.2015*** |
(1.64) |
(1.22) |
(0.21) |
(1.30) |
(2.76) | |
Log Si90*LogAge |
0.0314 |
0.0129 |
-0.0300 |
0.0280 |
0.0230 |
(1.13) |
(0.55) |
(0.73) |
(0.73) |
(1.58) | |
RESJUR |
0.1290 |
0.1087 |
-0.0369 |
0.0153 |
0.0293 |
(1.12) |
(1.23) |
(0.29) |
(0.11) |
(0.51) | |
INNPRO |
0.1059 |
0.0718 |
-0.1800 |
-0.1060 |
0.0282 |
(0.98) |
(0.87) |
(1.60) |
(0.91) |
(0.41) | |
INNPRC |
0.6739** |
0.1594 |
0.0396 |
0.1512 |
0.2913* |
(2.25) |
(1.38) |
(0.27) |
(0.95) |
(1.82) | |
TECHIGH |
0.1052 |
0.0095 |
0.2401* |
0.2033 |
0.1216** |
(0.94) |
(0.10) |
(1.73) |
(1.54) |
(2.23) | |
TECMED |
0.0232 |
-0.0795 |
0.0897 |
0.0531 |
0.0332 |
(0.22) |
(1.01) |
(0.87) |
(0.41) |
(0.66) | |
Select equation | |||||
Constant |
-2.6387*** |
0.5591 |
0.2452 |
-1.1065 |
-0.9764 |
(3.86) |
(0.56) |
(0.27) |
(0.75) |
(2.41) | |
Log Si90 |
0.1933 |
-0.3806* |
-0.1001 |
0.4515 |
0.0642 |
(1.24) |
(1.67) |
(0.43) |
(1.12) |
(0.66) | |
Log Age |
0.3290 |
-0.2314 |
-0.1675 |
0.2118 |
0.1468 |
(1.34) |
(0.52) |
(0.50) |
(0.44) |
(0.97) | |
Log Si90*LogAge |
-0.0436 |
0.1310 |
0.0584 |
-0.0859 |
-0.0096 |
(0.84) |
(1.37) |
(0.74) |
(0.73) |
(0.29) | |
RESJUR |
0.1742 |
0.2645 |
-0.6824*** |
-0.4030 |
-0.1717 |
(0.90) |
(1.04) |
(2.94) |
(1.25) |
(1.54) | |
INNPRO |
0.3409** |
0.7145*** |
0.6748*** |
0.4191 |
0.4817*** |
(1.99) |
(2.96) |
(3.53) |
(1.47) |
(4.92) | |
INNPRC |
1.5431*** |
0.8334*** |
1.1887*** |
0.7157** |
1.146*** |
(5.21) |
(3.30) |
(6.07) |
(2.33) |
(11.36) | |
TECHIGH |
0.3311* |
0.3620 |
-0.4392* |
0.1086 |
0.0637 |
(1.68) |
(1.09) |
(1.70) |
(0.33) |
(0.52) | |
TECMED |
0.2771 |
0.2172 |
-0.1262 |
0.7600** |
0.1733 |
(1.55) |
(0.86) |
(0.61) |
(2.07) |
(1.65) | |
Rho |
0.4813 |
-0.6357 |
-0.6175 |
-0.1693 |
0.0597 |
Sigma |
0.6046 |
0.5192 |
0.6373 |
0.5460 |
0.5552 |
Lambda |
0.2910 |
-0.3300 |
-0.3935 |
-0.0924 |
0.0332 |
Log likelihood |
-350.577 |
-249.983 |
-296.455 |
-167.004 |
-1140.677 |
LR test(1) |
0.25 |
1.20 |
1.33 |
0.14 |
0.02 |
Test for β1 = 1(2 |
6.88*** |
6.31** |
0.11 |
2.08 |
15.96*** |
N° observations |
369 |
271 |
276 |
157 |
1073 |
Censored |
167 |
37 |
88 |
30 |
322 |
Uncensored |
202 |
234 |
188 |
127 |
751 |
*** Significant at 99%; ** Significant atl 95%; * Significant at 90%..
t- values in parentheses.
11
More intriguing information
1. The Distribution of Income of Self-employed, Entrepreneurs and Professions as Revealed from Micro Income Tax Statistics in Germany2. AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION OF THE PRODUCTION EFFECTS OF ADOPTING GM SEED TECHNOLOGY: THE CASE OF FARMERS IN ARGENTINA
3. THE DIGITAL DIVIDE: COMPUTER USE, BASIC SKILLS AND EMPLOYMENT
4. The name is absent
5. Regional differentiation in the Russian federation: A cluster-based typification
6. Density Estimation and Combination under Model Ambiguity
7. Cross-Country Evidence on the Link between the Level of Infrastructure and Capital Inflows
8. Testing the Information Matrix Equality with Robust Estimators
9. Innovation Policy and the Economy, Volume 11
10. Synthesis and biological activity of α-galactosyl ceramide KRN7000 and galactosyl (α1→2) galactosyl ceramide