A Multimodal Framework for Computer Mediated Learning: The Reshaping of Curriculum Knowledge and Learning



diagrams and graphs. Students are required to use these representations to “describe
patterns or relationships in data” and to draw scientific conclusions.

The national curriculum objectives that are outlined above inform the science lesson
on ‘states of matter’ analysed in this chapter but do so in particular ways, ways which
differ in relation to the technology used to mediate the curriculum. Throughout the
lesson the students use the multimedia package
Multimedia Science School to
investigate particle arrangements in a solid, a liquid and a gas and to explore the
changes in particle arrangement that occur with heating and cooling. The lesson is
divided into two parts, in the first part the students work at individual computers
using a worksheet prepared by the teacher, and in the second part the students work
with an interactive whiteboard to present their ideas to the whole class for discussion.

In the following section I discuss the ways in which the entities ‘states of matter’ and
‘particles’ have been taught traditionally in the science classroom without new
technologies.

The Representation of ‘States of Matter’ on Page and in the Classroom

‘Particles’ and ‘states of matter’ are represented in the majority of School Science
textbooks in two main ways: either in the form of diagrams (e.g. figure 6.1) or in the
form of photographic images. The former kind of image serves to classify ‘states of
matter’ in terms of their arrangement, the density of ‘particles’, and the spacing of
‘particles’. The latter type of image represents everyday examples of ‘states of
matter’ in a ‘realistic form’ (e.g. figure 6.2). These images tend to offer
representations of the ‘states of matter’ that draw on children’s everyday experience
of materials- usually ice, water, and steam. Teachers offer ‘canonical’ images of
‘states of matter’ similar to these in the classroom. Here I draw briefly on work with
colleagues on the multimodal production of school science (Jewitt and Kress, 2002)
which analyses the multimodal construction of ‘states of matter’ in a lesson with year
eight students. In order to represent and communicate the entity ‘particles’ the

211



More intriguing information

1. Second Order Filter Distribution Approximations for Financial Time Series with Extreme Outlier
2. Modeling industrial location decisions in U.S. counties
3. Neural Network Modelling of Constrained Spatial Interaction Flows
4. The name is absent
5. Chebyshev polynomial approximation to approximate partial differential equations
6. The English Examining Boards: Their route from independence to government outsourcing agencies
7. WP 36 - Women's Preferences or Delineated Policies? The development or part-time work in the Netherlands, Germany and the United Kingdom
8. TINKERING WITH VALUATION ESTIMATES: IS THERE A FUTURE FOR WILLINGNESS TO ACCEPT MEASURES?
9. Are class size differences related to pupils’ educational progress and classroom processes? Findings from the Institute of Education Class Size Study of children aged 5-7 Years
10. The name is absent
11. A Study of Prospective Ophthalmology Residents’ Career Perceptions
12. A simple enquiry on heterogeneous lending rates and lending behaviour
13. Anti Microbial Resistance Profile of E. coli isolates From Tropical Free Range Chickens
14. The name is absent
15. IMMIGRATION POLICY AND THE AGRICULTURAL LABOR MARKET: THE EFFECT ON JOB DURATION
16. Cancer-related electronic support groups as navigation-aids: Overcoming geographic barriers
17. The name is absent
18. A Rational Analysis of Alternating Search and Reflection Strategies in Problem Solving
19. Database Search Strategies for Proteomic Data Sets Generated by Electron Capture Dissociation Mass Spectrometry
20. Computational Experiments with the Fuzzy Love and Romance